A randomized double-blind 12-week study of quetiapine, risperidone or fluphenazine on sexual functioning in people with schizophrenia
Abstract
Sexual dysfunction is common in people suffering from schizophrenia and is reported by patients to be a significant reason for medication nonadherence. This report contains data for 27 people with schizophrenia who participated in a randomized double-blind 12-week trial of risperidone (4 mg/day), quetiapine (400 mg/day) or fluphenazine (12.5 mg/day). At baseline and endpoint, subjects were rated on the Changes in Sexual Function Questionnaire (CSFQ), the Prolactin-Related Adverse Event Questionnaire (PRAEQ) and had prolactin levels drawn. Endpoint prolactin levels were 50.6 +/- 40.4, 24.4 +/- 18.5, and 8.2 +/- 4.4 mg/dl for risperidone (N = 12), fluphenazine (N = 9) and quetiapine (N=6), respectively (F = 7.5,df = 2, p = 0.005, controlling for sex). Orgasm quality/ability improved significantly for quetiapine as compared to fluphenazine and risperidone (F = 4.41, df = 2, p = 0.033). Seventy-eight percent of patients on fluphenazine reported sexual dysfunction whereas did only 42 and 50% of those on risperidone and quetiapine. Forty percent of quetiapine patients reported they felt better about their sexuality as compared to previous treatment, as did 55% on risperidone. Conversely, only 13% of fluphenazine subjects reported any improvement. Hormonal problems (menstrual problems, gynecomastia, galactorrhea) were predominately observed in risperidone-treated subjects. Overall, quetiapine was associated with a normalization of prolactin levels and had the greatest benefits among these drugs regarding sexual functioning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only few studies have directly compared the sexual functioning associated with different atypical antipsychotics.
“To date, only few studies (534-547) have directly compared the sexual functioning associated with different atypical AP.”
From Physical illness in patients with severe mental disorders. I. Prevalence, impact of medications and disparities in health care (2011) · cites this paper as [541]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 88
- Authors
- Kelly, D. L., & Conley, R. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kelly, Deanna L.
- ORCID
- Kelly, Deanna L.
- Venue
- Psychoneuroendocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 340-346
- ISSN
- 0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096402187
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH40279, R01MH047311, MH 47311)
- National Center for Research Resources (M01-RR165001)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, sexual dysfunction, quetiapine, risperidone, fluphenazine, antipsychotic adverse effects, prolactin, hyperprolactinemia, orgasm, galactorrhea, gynecomastia, menstrual disorders, medication adherence
- MeSH terms
- Quetiapine Fumarate, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Dibenzothiazepines, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fluphenazine, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Orgasm, Patient Compliance, Prolactin, Schizophrenia, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Antipsychotic Agents, Risperidone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review