Cited by 88Schizophrenia research and treatmentSexual function and dysfunction studiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

A randomized double-blind 12-week study of quetiapine, risperidone or fluphenazine on sexual functioning in people with schizophrenia

Kelly, Deanna L., Conley, Robert R.·2006·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Sexual dysfunction is common in people suffering from schizophrenia and is reported by patients to be a significant reason for medication nonadherence. This report contains data for 27 people with schizophrenia who participated in a randomized double-blind 12-week trial of risperidone (4 mg/day), quetiapine (400 mg/day) or fluphenazine (12.5 mg/day). At baseline and endpoint, subjects were rated on the Changes in Sexual Function Questionnaire (CSFQ), the Prolactin-Related Adverse Event Questionnaire (PRAEQ) and had prolactin levels drawn. Endpoint prolactin levels were 50.6 +/- 40.4, 24.4 +/- 18.5, and 8.2 +/- 4.4 mg/dl for risperidone (N = 12), fluphenazine (N = 9) and quetiapine (N=6), respectively (F = 7.5,df = 2, p = 0.005, controlling for sex). Orgasm quality/ability improved significantly for quetiapine as compared to fluphenazine and risperidone (F = 4.41, df = 2, p = 0.033). Seventy-eight percent of patients on fluphenazine reported sexual dysfunction whereas did only 42 and 50% of those on risperidone and quetiapine. Forty percent of quetiapine patients reported they felt better about their sexuality as compared to previous treatment, as did 55% on risperidone. Conversely, only 13% of fluphenazine subjects reported any improvement. Hormonal problems (menstrual problems, gynecomastia, galactorrhea) were predominately observed in risperidone-treated subjects. Overall, quetiapine was associated with a normalization of prolactin levels and had the greatest benefits among these drugs regarding sexual functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.08.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 88

Authors
Kelly, D. L., & Conley, R. R.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Deanna L.
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
340-346
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096402187
Cited by
88
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH40279, R01MH047311, MH 47311)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01-RR165001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
schizophrenia, sexual dysfunction, quetiapine, risperidone, fluphenazine, antipsychotic adverse effects, prolactin, hyperprolactinemia, orgasm, galactorrhea, gynecomastia, menstrual disorders, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Quetiapine Fumarate, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Dibenzothiazepines, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fluphenazine, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Orgasm, Patient Compliance, Prolactin, Schizophrenia, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Antipsychotic Agents, Risperidone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review