Education modulates cortisol reactivity to the Trier Social Stress Test in middle-aged adults
Abstract
The present study assessed the modulating effect of education level on cortisol reactivity to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) in a sample of 101 middle-aged adults (22 males, 79 females) between the ages of 50 and 65. The TSST involves a public speech and mental arithmetic task in front of an audience. No previous studies have assessed whether education level can have an impact on cortisol reactivity to this psychosocial stressor. It is plausible that greater exposure to academia may impact how one perceives and responds to the demands of the speech and arithmetic task. Should education have an impact on cortisol reactivity to the TSST, future studies will be required to control for this factor in order to reduce both statistical error and false interpretations. In addition to completing the TSST, participants were administered a battery of neurocognitive tests and personality questionnaires, including a report on education level (i.e. number of years total and degree: High School, Junior College, Technical, University). Results showed that adults with post-secondary education above Junior College tended to secrete higher cortisol levels overall, as measured by total area under the curve. However, it was the group with lower educational attainment who showed a greater stress response specific to the TSST, as measured by percentage increase in cortisol from pre- to post-TSST. Analyses also found that higher educated adults performed better than their less educated peers on verbal fluency. Considering that the TSST is an oral task, it is suggested that middle-aged individuals with a lower level of education may find the TSST more stressful due to lower verbal capacity, which may lead to an increased cortisol response to the TSST when compared to individuals with a higher level of education.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Current evidence suggests that lower SES may synergize with other stressors, potentiating the negative impact of stressors on accumulation of allostatic load.
“Current evidence, for example, suggests that lower SES may synergize with other stressors, potentiating the negative impact of “stressors” on accumulation of AL. 67,83,192,193”
From Socio‐economic differentials in peripheral biology: Cumulative allostatic load (2010) · cites this paper as [193]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 75
- Authors
- Fiocco, A. J., Joober, R., & Lupien, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Lupien, Sonia J.
- Venue
- Psychoneuroendocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 8-10
- Pages
- 1158-1163
- ISSN
- 0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061466632
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Keywords
- educational attainment, cortisol response, Trier Social Stress Test, psychosocial stress, middle-aged adults, verbal fluency, stress response, social stress, neuropsychological performance
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Cognition, Education, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Psychological Tests, Social Class, Stress, Psychological, Recovery of Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review