HPA system regulation and adult attachment anxiety: individual differences in reactive and awakening cortisol
Abstract
Early life experiences can influence hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis regulation in adulthood, in both animals and humans. In humans, they have also been shown to influence adult attachment styles. However, the relationship between adult attachment styles and HPA axis regulation is largely unexplored. The present study investigated the relationship among varying levels of attachment anxiety and avoidance with both the cortisol response to acute stress (CRS) and the cortisol response to awakening (CRA) in 48 adult women. Attachment-unrelated stress was induced by a laboratory stress task. Saliva for free cortisol assessment was sampled before and after the stress task in the laboratory and at home on 2 consecutive days in the morning after awakening. We found that attachment anxiety but not attachment avoidance was associated with cortisol measures. Attachment anxiety was positively correlated with CRS and negatively with CRA. Finally, the two cortisol parameters were negatively associated with one another. The results are discussed with respect to (1) recent findings suggesting that the HPA system and hippocampus are programmed during critical development periods, establishing a certain trajectory of physiological responsiveness throughout life, and (2) a model that links development of the hippocampus with self development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individual differences in stress response system functioning are associated with differences in romantic attachment styles, and romantic attachment predicts relationship stability, commitment, and investment.
“Individual differences in SRS functioning have been associated with differences in romantic attachment styles (e.g., Diamond and Hicks, 2005; Quirin et al., 2008; Laurent and Powers, 2007; Oskis et al., 2010; Powers et al., 2006); in turn, romantic attachment predicts relationship stability, commitment and investment (reviewed in Del Giudice, 2009a)”
From The Adaptive Calibration Model of stress responsivity (2011) · cites this paper as Quirin et al., 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 110 · Cited by 167
- Authors
- Quirin, M., Pruessner, J. C., & Kuhl, J.
- Affiliations
- Osnabrück University (DE)
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Quirin, Markus
- Venue
- Psychoneuroendocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 581-590
- ISSN
- 0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070146267
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 110
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Keywords
- HPA axis regulation, attachment avoidance, cortisol awakening response, early life experience, hippocampus development, self-development, individual differences, women
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anxiety, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Middle Aged, Object Attachment, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review