Testosterone responsiveness to winning and losing experiences in female soccer players
Abstract
In many animal species including humans circulating androgen levels in males respond to social challenges. This response has been interpreted as an adaptive mechanism that helps the individuals to adjust their behavior to changes in social context. According to this hypothesis socially modulated androgen levels (e.g. increased levels in dominants and decreased levels in subordinates) would influence the subsequent expression of social behavior in a status-dependent fashion. This rationale is partially based on male physiology and therefore has been rarely investigated in females. Here, we investigated if a hormonal response to a social challenge that produces changes in status is also present in human females. We have collected saliva from and administered questionnaires to female soccer players of both teams playing the final match of the Portuguese Female soccer league. Samples were collected on a neutral day and on the day of the game both before and after the match. The change in testosterone levels (i.e. post-game-pre-game values=Delta(T)) was positive in the winners and negative in the losers and there was a significant difference in the testosterone change (i.e. Delta(T)) over the game between winners and losers. Cortisol levels did not vary with contest outcome. An anticipatory rise in circulating levels of both hormones (testosterone and cortisol) was detected before the match. Paralleling the hormonal responses, changes in mood and anxiety state were also found between both teams, with more positive states being observed in winners and more negative states being observed in losers at the end of the match. These results suggest that testosterone also responds to social challenges in human females and that contest-induced mood changes may influence this response.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Testosterone increases in winners after athletic competition in both men and women, and athletes with highest saliva testosterone have higher team rankings.
“In both men and woman, testosterone increases in “winners” following an athletic competition and, on average, athletes with the highest saliva testosterone levels have higher rankings within the team13.”
From Neurobiology of resilience (2012) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 163
- Authors
- Oliveira, T., Gouveia, M. J., & Oliveira, R. F.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Oliveira, R.F.
- Venue
- Psychoneuroendocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1056-1064
- ISSN
- 0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137519640
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 13.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Keywords
- testosterone, social challenges, female soccer players, contest outcome, social status, cortisol, mood, anxiety
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Aggression, Anxiety, Competitive Behavior, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Saliva, Soccer, Testosterone, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review