Associations between sociodemographic, sampling and health factors and various salivary cortisol indicators in a large sample without psychopathology
Abstract
Background Cortisol levels are increasingly often assessed in large-scale psychosomatic research. Although determinants of different salivary cortisol indicators have been described, they have not yet been systematically studied within the same study with a large sample size. Sociodemographic, health and sampling-related determinants of salivary cortisol levels were examined in a sample without potential disturbances because of psychopathology. Methods Using 491 respondents (mean age=43.0 years, 59.5% female) without lifetime psychiatric disorders from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA), sociodemographic, sampling and health determinants of salivary cortisol levels were examined. Respondents collected seven salivary cortisol samples providing information about 1-h awakening cortisol, diurnal slope, evening cortisol and a dexamethasone (0.5mg) suppression test (DST). Results Higher overall morning cortisol values were found for smokers, physically active persons, persons without cardiovascular disease, sampling on a working day or in a month with less daylight. In addition, the cortisol awakening response was significantly flattened for males, persons with cardiovascular disease, those with late awakening times and those with longer sleep duration. Diurnal slope was steeper in men, physically active persons, late awakeners, working persons, and season with less daylight. A higher evening cortisol level was associated with older age, smoking and season with more daylight. Cortisol suppression after dexamethasone ingestion was found to be less pronounced in smokers, less active persons and sampling on a weekday. Conclusion Sociodemographic variables (sex, age), sampling factors (awakening time, working day, sampling month, sleep duration) and health indicators (smoking, physical activity, cardiovascular disease) were shown to influence different features of salivary cortisol levels. Smoking had the most consistent effect on all cortisol variables. These factors should be considered in psychoneuroendocrinology research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two studies reported a lower CAR in participants with T2DM than in controls but no association with the cortisol slope, and another study found no association between T2DM and any cortisol parameter across the day.
“with two studies reporting a lower CAR in participants with T2DM than in controls 33, 34 but no association with the cortisol slope 33, and the other study finding no association between T2DM and any cortisol parameter across the day 35 .”
From Type 2 diabetes mellitus and psychological stress — a modifiable risk factor (2017) · cites this paper as [35]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 193
- Authors
- Vreeburg, S. A., Kruijtzer, B. P., van Pelt, J., van Dyck, R., DeRijk, R. H., Hoogendijk, W. J. G., Smit, J. H., Zitman, F. G., & Penninx, B. W. J. H.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
- Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Penninx, Brenda W.J.H.
- Venue
- Psychoneuroendocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1109-1120
- ISSN
- 0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148222458
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
- GGZ Drenthe
- Nederlands Instituut voor Onderzoek van de Gezondheidszorg
- Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Keywords
- salivary cortisol, cortisol awakening response, diurnal cortisol slope, dexamethasone suppression test, smoking, physical activity, cardiovascular disease, sleep duration, wake-up time, sociodemographic factors, sampling effects, psychosomatic research
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Circadian Rhythm, Dexamethasone, Female, Health Status, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Middle Aged, Research Design, Saliva, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, Wakefulness, Biomarkers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review