The Trier Social Stress Test for Groups (TSST-G): a new research tool for controlled simultaneous social stress exposure in a group format
Abstract
Psychological stress is an ubiquitous challenge across human cultures affecting mental and physical health. Recent evidence indicates that performance tasks combining elements of socio-evaluative threat and uncontrollability elicit reliable stress responses. The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) is the most frequently used psychological protocol in stress research; however, to date it has only been available in a single-subject version. In particular, there is an increasing need in several emerging research fields such as stress research or social neurosciences for a standardized research tool to expose relatively large groups of subjects to controlled simultaneous stress. In search of a laboratory stressor that allows simultaneous stress exposure in a group format, we exposed a total of 25 healthy male participants to the Trier Social Stress Test for Groups (TSST-G; public speaking and mental arithmetic tasks in front of a panel of two evaluators in groups of six participants) and a specific control condition. Results showed that the TSST-G induced significant increases in cortisol, heart rate, and psychological stress responses. The TSST-G provides a novel, effective, and economical protocol for experimental paradigms requiring simultaneous stress induction in multiple participants.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The TSST subsample was randomly selected and its sample size is similar to other studies using the TSST.
“This limits the generalizability of our findings, though the sample was randomly selected and the sample size is similar to other studies using the TSST (e.g.(32)).”
From The role of insomnia in the treatment of chronic fatigue. (2015) · cites this paper as [32]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 387
- Authors
- von Dawans, B., Kirschbaum, C., & Heinrichs, M.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Heinrichs, Markus
- Venue
- Psychoneuroendocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 514-522
- ISSN
- 0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107619947
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
- FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- Trier Social Stress Test for Groups, social stress, laboratory stress induction, cortisol, heart rate, psychological stress response, public speaking, mental arithmetic, uncontrollability
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Algorithms, Group Processes, Heart Rate, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Models, Biological, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Social Adjustment, Social Behavior, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review