Cited by 53Stress Responses and CortisolNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Effects of social isolation on mRNA expression for corticotrophin-releasing hormone receptors in prairie voles

Open access
Pournajafi-Nazarloo, Hossein, Partoo, Leila, Yee, Jason, Stevenson, Jennifer, Sanzenbacher, Lisa, Kenkel, William, Mohsenpour, Seyed Ramezan, Hashimoto, Kozo +1 more·2011·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that various type of stressors modulate messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) for type 1 corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) receptor (CRH-R1 mRNA) and type 2 CRH receptor (CRH-R2 mRNA). The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of social isolation stress of varying durations on the CRH, CRH-R1 and CRH-R2 mRNAs expression in the hypothalamus, hippocampus and pituitary of socially monogamous female and male prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Isolation for 1h (single isolation) or 1h of isolation every day for 4 weeks (repeated isolation) was followed by a significant increase in plasma corticosterone levels. Single or repeated isolation increased hypothalamic CRH mRNA expression, but no changes in CRH-R1 mRNA in the hypothalamus were observed. Continuous isolation for 4 weeks (chronic isolation) showed no effect on hypothalamic CRH or CRH-R1 mRNAs in female or male animals. However, hypothalamic CRH-R2 mRNA was significantly reduced in voles exposed to chronic isolation. Single or repeated isolation, but not chronic isolation, significantly increased CRH-R1 mRNA and decreased CRH-R2 mRNA in the pituitary. Despite elevated CRH mRNA expression, CRH-R1 and CRH-R2 mRNAs were not modulated in the hippocampus following single or repeated isolation. Although, chronic isolation did not affect hippocampal CRH or CRH-R1 mRNAs, it did increase CRH-R2 mRNA expression in females and males. The results of the present study in prairie voles suggest that social isolation has receptor subtype and species-specific consequences for the modulation of gene expression for CRH and its receptors in brain and pituitary. Previous studies have revealed a female-biased increase in oxytocin in response to chronic isolation; however, we did not find a sex difference in CRH or its receptors following single, repeated or chronic social isolation, suggesting that sexually dimorphic processes beyond the CRH system, possibly involving vasopressin, might explain this difference.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.10.015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A shorter 1-hour isolation in adult prairie voles housed with same-sex siblings increased hypothalamic and hippocampal CRF mRNA.

    “a shorter period (1 h) of social isolation in adult male and female prairie voles housed with same-sex siblings, resulted in increased hypothalamic and hippocampal CRF mRNA83.”

    From Neural mechanisms of social homeostasis (2019) · cites this paper as [83]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 53

Authors
Pournajafi-Nazarloo, H., Partoo, L., Yee, J., Stevenson, J., Sanzenbacher, L., Kenkel, W., Mohsenpour, S. R., Hashimoto, K., & Carter, C. S.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
780-789
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077995837
Cited by
53
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
social isolation, corticotropin-releasing factor, CRH receptor 1, CRH receptor 2, Microtus ochrogaster, hypothalamus, hippocampus, pituitary gland, corticosterone, chronic stress, sex differences, oxytocin, vasopressin, gene expression
MeSH terms
CRF Receptor, Type 1, Animals, Corticosterone, Arvicolinae, Female, Hippocampus, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Hypothalamus, Male, Oxytocin, Pituitary Gland, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Random Allocation, RNA, Messenger, Sex Characteristics, Social Isolation, Species Specificity, Stress, Psychological, Transcription, Genetic, Vasopressins, Receptors, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review