Cited by 203Stress Responses and CortisolAdrenal Hormones and DisordersClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

The CIRCORT database: Reference ranges and seasonal changes in diurnal salivary cortisol derived from a meta-dataset comprised of 15 field studies

Open access
Miller, Robert, Stalder, Tobias, Jarczok, Marc, Almeida, David M., Badrick, Ellena, Bartels, Meike, Boomsma, Dorret I., Coe, Christopher L. +12 more·2016·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Diurnal salivary cortisol profiles are valuable indicators of adrenocortical functioning in epidemiological research and clinical practice. However, normative reference values derived from a large number of participants and across a wide age range are still missing. To fill this gap, data were compiled from 15 independently conducted field studies with a total of 104,623 salivary cortisol samples obtained from 18,698 unselected individuals (mean age: 48.3 years, age range: 0.5-98.5 years, 39% females). Besides providing a descriptive analysis of the complete dataset, we also performed mixed-effects growth curve modeling of diurnal salivary cortisol (i.e., 1-16h after awakening). Cortisol decreased significantly across the day and was influenced by both, age and sex. Intriguingly, we also found a pronounced impact of sampling season with elevated diurnal cortisol in spring and decreased levels in autumn. However, the majority of variance was accounted for by between-participant and between-study variance components. Based on these analyses, reference ranges (LC/MS-MS calibrated) for cortisol concentrations in saliva were derived for different times across the day, with more specific reference ranges generated for males and females in different age categories. This integrative summary provides important reference values on salivary cortisol to aid basic scientists and clinicians in interpreting deviations from the normal diurnal cycle.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.07.201

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 203

Authors
Miller, R., Stalder, T., Jarczok, M., Almeida, D. M., Badrick, E., Bartels, M., Boomsma, D. I., Coe, C. L., Dekker, M. C. J., Donzella, B., Fischer, J. E., Gunnar, M. R., Kumari, M., Lederbogen, F., Power, C., Ryff, C. D., Subramanian, S. V., Tiemeier, H., Watamura, S. E., & Kirschbaum, C.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • University of Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Robert
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
73
Pages
16-23
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2465060799
Cited by
203
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 1
FWCI
12.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2017-02-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • University College London
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001425)
  • Medical Research Council (G0000934)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG020166, U19AG051426)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
reference values, seasonal variation, age differences, sex differences, adrenocortical function, diurnal cortisol rhythm, between-study variance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, Circadian Rhythm, Europe, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Saliva, Seasons, United States, Young Adult, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review