Cited by 26Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyInfluenza Virus Research StudiesChild and Adolescent Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Racial disparities in vaccination for seasonal influenza in early childhood

Anandappa, M., Adjei Boakye, E., Li, W., Zeng, W., Rebmann, T., Chang, J.J.·2018·Public Health

Abstract

Objectives Influenza vaccination is the best protection against infection and severe complications of disease, such as hospitalization and death. Therefore, it is important to accurately estimate vaccination coverage and to evaluate the role of race/ethnicity. This study examines racial disparities in influenza vaccination among children using a nationally representative sample.Study design This study used cross-sectional data from the 2009-2014 National Immunization Survey for children aged 19-35 months (n = 98,186) in the United States.Methods The outcome variable was receipt of influenza vaccination (yes/no) and exposure variable was race/ethnicity. Weighted multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the effect of race/ethnicity on receipt of the influenza vaccine.Results The overall vaccination rates were 81.6% for non-Hispanic whites, 79.2% for Hispanics, 80.5% for non-Hispanic blacks, and 80.7% for non-Hispanic mixed/other. In the adjusted model, compared with non-Hispanic white children, Hispanic children were 13% less likely to receive influenza vaccination within the last 12 months (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.80-0.94). In addition, children aged 24-29 months (aOR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.44-0.52) and 30-35 months (aOR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.30-0.36) were significantly less likely to receive influenza vaccination within the last 12 months compared with those who were 19-23 months old.Conclusions There were differences in influenza vaccination rates among different racial groups. Hispanic children had the lowest vaccination rates. Findings from our study have significant implications for targeted interventions to increase the overall vaccination rate for children in the United States.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.01.030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 26

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Betancourt, 2003, vol. 118, 293

Metadata

Authors
Anandappa, M., Adjei Boakye, E., Li, W., Zeng, W., Rebmann, T., & Chang, J. J.
Affiliations
Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Chang, J.J.
Venue
Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
158
Pages
1-8
ISSN
0033-3506 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790986194
Cited by
26
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child and Adolescent Health
Keywords
seasonal influenza vaccination, racial disparities, Hispanic children, early childhood, vaccination coverage, age differences in vaccination, National Immunization Survey
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Infant, Influenza, Human, Influenza Vaccines, Male, Seasons, United States, Vaccination, White People, Racial Groups, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review