The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Racial disparities in vaccination for seasonal influenza in early childhood
Abstract
Objectives Influenza vaccination is the best protection against infection and severe complications of disease, such as hospitalization and death. Therefore, it is important to accurately estimate vaccination coverage and to evaluate the role of race/ethnicity. This study examines racial disparities in influenza vaccination among children using a nationally representative sample.Study design This study used cross-sectional data from the 2009-2014 National Immunization Survey for children aged 19-35 months (n = 98,186) in the United States.Methods The outcome variable was receipt of influenza vaccination (yes/no) and exposure variable was race/ethnicity. Weighted multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the effect of race/ethnicity on receipt of the influenza vaccine.Results The overall vaccination rates were 81.6% for non-Hispanic whites, 79.2% for Hispanics, 80.5% for non-Hispanic blacks, and 80.7% for non-Hispanic mixed/other. In the adjusted model, compared with non-Hispanic white children, Hispanic children were 13% less likely to receive influenza vaccination within the last 12 months (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.80-0.94). In addition, children aged 24-29 months (aOR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.44-0.52) and 30-35 months (aOR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.30-0.36) were significantly less likely to receive influenza vaccination within the last 12 months compared with those who were 19-23 months old.Conclusions There were differences in influenza vaccination rates among different racial groups. Hispanic children had the lowest vaccination rates. Findings from our study have significant implications for targeted interventions to increase the overall vaccination rate for children in the United States.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Race and ethnicity contribute to disparities in vaccine compliance in children and adolescents.
“Previous studies demonstrate that race and ethnicity contribute to disparities in vaccine compliance in children and adolescents.41–44”
From SARS-CoV-2 vaccine testing and trials in the pediatric population: biologic, ethical, research, and implementation challenges (2021) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 26
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Betancourt, 2003, vol. 118, 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Anandappa, M., Adjei Boakye, E., Li, W., Zeng, W., Rebmann, T., & Chang, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Saint Louis University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chang, J.J.
- Venue
- Public Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 158
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 0033-3506 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2790986194
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child and Adolescent Health
- Keywords
- seasonal influenza vaccination, racial disparities, Hispanic children, early childhood, vaccination coverage, age differences in vaccination, National Immunization Survey
- MeSH terms
- Black or African American, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Infant, Influenza, Human, Influenza Vaccines, Male, Seasons, United States, Vaccination, White People, Racial Groups, Healthcare Disparities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review