CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

From blunt to cutting: Distinguishing alternating method flakes in early stages on rounded blanks

Guardiola, M., Morales, J.I., Vergès, J.M.·2016·Quaternary International
DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.08.039
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.08.039

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Amick, 1988, An evaluation of debitage produced by experimental bifacial core reduction of a Georgetown Chert Nodule, Lithic Technology, 17, 26, 10.1080/01977261.1988.11754523 · DOI
  2. Bleed, 2002, Obviously sequential, but continuous or staged? Refits and cognition in three late Paleolithic assemblages from Japan, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 21, 329, 10.1016/S0278-4165(02)00001-6 · DOI
  3. Bradbury, 1995, Flake typologies and alternative approaches: an experimental assessment, Lithic Technology, 20, 100
  4. Bradbury, 1999, Examining stage and continuum models of flake debris analysis: an experimental approach, Journal of Archaeological Science, 26, 105, 10.1006/jasc.1998.0309 · DOI
  5. Braun, 2005, Flake recovery rates and inferences of Oldowan hominin behavior: a response to Kimura 1999, 2002, Journal of Human Evolution, 48, 525, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.02.002 · DOI
  6. Braun, 2008, Oldowan reduction sequences: methodological considerations, Journal of Archaeological Science, 38, 2153, 10.1016/j.jas.2008.01.015 · DOI
  7. Burton, 1980, Making sense of waste flakes: new methods for investigating the technology and economies behind chipped stone assemblages, Journal of Archaeological Science, 7, 131, 10.1016/S0305-4403(80)80016-1 · DOI
  8. Callahan, 1979, The basic biface knapping in the eastern fluted points tradition: a manual for flintknappers and lithic analysts, Archaeology of Eastern North America, 7
  9. Crompton, 1993, Allometry and multidimensional form in Acheulean bifaces from Kilombe, Kenya, Journal of Human Evolution, 25, 175, 10.1006/jhev.1993.1043 · DOI
  10. de la Torre, 2011, The Early Stone Age lithic assemblages of Gadeb (Ethiopia) and the developed Oldowan/early Acheulean in East Africa, Journal of Human Evolution, 60, 768, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.01.009 · DOI
  11. Delagnes, 2005, Late Pliocene hominid knapping skills: the case of Lokalalei 2C, West Turkana, Kenya, Journal of Human Evolution, 48, 435, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.12.005 · DOI
  12. Dibble, 2005, The measurement and interpretation of cortex in lithic assemblages, American Antiquity, 70, 545, 10.2307/40035313 · DOI
  13. Eren, 2012, Why Levallois? A morphometric comparison of experimental “preferential” Levallois flakes versus debitage flakes, PLoS ONE, 7, E29273, 10.1371/journal.pone.0029273 · DOI
  14. Goren-Inbar, 2011, The technology and significance of the Acheulian giant cores of Gesher Benot Ya'aqov, Israel, Journal of Archaeological Science, 38, 1901, 10.1016/j.jas.2011.03.037 · DOI
  15. Jones, 1994, Results of experimental work in relation to the stone industries of Olduvai Gorge, vol. 5, 254
  16. Kimura, 2002, Examining time trends in the Oldowan technology of beds I and II, Olduvai Gorge, Journal of Human Evolution, 43, 291, 10.1006/jhev.2002.0576 · DOI
  17. Marwick, 2008, What attributes are important for the measurement of assemblage reduction intensity? Results from an experimental stone artefact assemblage with relevance to the Hoabinhian of mainland Southeast Asia, Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 1189, 10.1016/j.jas.2007.08.007 · DOI
  18. Moore, 2003, Australian aboriginal biface reduction techniques on the Georgia River, Camooweal, Queensland, Australian Archaeology, 56, 22, 10.1080/03122417.2003.11681746 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Roth, 1998, Production and transport of blanks and tools at the French Middle Paleolithic site of Combe-Capelle Bas, American Antiquity, 63, 47, 10.2307/2694775 · DOI
  20. Semaw, 2000, The world's oldest stone artifacts from Gona, Ethiopia: their implications for understanding stone technology and patterns of human evolution between 2.6–1.5 Million years ago, Journal of Archaeological Science, 27, 1197, 10.1006/jasc.1999.0592 · DOI
  21. Stout, 2008, Neural correlates of Early Stone Age toolmaking: technology, language and cognition in human evolution, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 363, 1939, 10.1098/rstb.2008.0001 · DOI
  22. Stout, 2010, Technological variation in the earliest Oldowan from Gona, Afar, Ethiopia, Journal of Human Evolution, 58, 474, 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.02.005 · DOI
  23. Toth, 1985, Oldowan reassessed: a close look at early stone artefacts, Journal of Archaeological Science, 12, 101, 10.1016/0305-4403(85)90056-1 · DOI
  24. Toth, 1988, Behavioral inferences from early stone artifact assemblages: an experimental model, Journal of Human Evolution, 16, 763, 10.1016/0047-2484(87)90023-6 · DOI
  25. White, 1998, On the significance of Acheulean biface variability in southern Britain, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 64, 15, 10.1017/S0079497X00002164 · DOI
  26. White, 2003, Lower Paleolithic core technology and the origins of the Levallois method in North-Western Europe, Current Anthropology, 44, 598, 10.1086/377653 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Guardiola, M., Morales, J. I., & Vergès, J. M.
Venue
Quaternary International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
411
Pages
378-385
ISSN
1040-6182
DOI
10.1016/j.quaint.2015.08.039
Cited by
4
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
AGAUR of Generalitat de Catalunya (FI-B2-2014)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review