Victimization of students with autism spectrum disorder: a review of prevalence and risk factors
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Environmental and systemic factors beyond the control of the individual may contribute heavily to autistic distress.
“there are environmental and systemic factors beyond the control of the individual that may also contribute heavily to autistic distress.”
From Autistic Cognition: Charting Routes to Anxiety (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 88 · Cited by 140
- Authors
- Sreckovic, M. A., Brunsting, N. C., & Able, H.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sreckovic, Melissa A.
- Venue
- Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1155-1172
- ISSN
- 1878-0237 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-9467
- OpenAlex
- W2078225641
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 13.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Research in Autism (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, bullying, victimization, school bullying, prevalence, risk factors, social vulnerability, behavioral problems, parental mental health, socioeconomic status, peer support, bullying prevention, school-age youth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review