Autism spectrum disorders: Neuroimaging findings from systematic reviews
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent large meta-analyses and studies pooling MRI scans across hundreds of autistic participants reveal little by way of qualitative differences from neurotypical samples.
“However, recent large meta-analyses and studies pooling MRI scans across hundreds of autistic participants, diagnosed in terms of the current wider criteria, reveal little by way of qualitative differences from neurotypical samples (e.g., Pua, Bowden & Seal, 2017).”
From Annual Research Review: Looking back to look forward – changes in the concept of autism and implications for future research (2020) · cites this paper as Pua, Bowden & Seal, 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 37
- Authors
- Pua, E. P. K., Bowden, S. C., & Seal, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Pua, Emmanuel Peng Kiat
- Venue
- Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 34
- Pages
- 28-33
- ISSN
- 1878-0237 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-9467
- OpenAlex
- W2557704495
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research in Autism (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, neuroimaging biomarkers, grey matter, structural connectivity, resting-state functional connectivity, neurodevelopmental trajectories, genetic and environmental risk factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review