Autism and employment: what works
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Through governance structures relating to recruitment, adjustments, and flexible working practices, policy positions inclusion as an ongoing organisational responsibility linked to equity and rights.
“Through governance structures relating to recruitment, adjustments, and flexible working practices, policy positions inclusion as an ongoing organisational responsibility linked to equity and rights (Hayward et al., 2019)”
From The system-level organisational design framework: a neuro-cognitive trait interaction approach to workplace inclusion for autistic people (2026) · cites this paper as Hayward et al., 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 135
- Authors
- Hayward, S. M., McVilly, K. R., & Stokes, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Macquarie University (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Deakin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hayward, Susan M.
- Venue
- Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 60
- Pages
- 48-58
- ISSN
- 1878-0237 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-9467
- OpenAlex
- W2912222411
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 15.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Research in Autism (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, employment of autistic adults, person-organization fit, diversity climate, workplace relationships, work environment, conservation of resources theory, social exchange theory, workplace inclusion, career support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
