Cited by 32Reproductive Health and ContraceptionMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsReproductive Health and Technologies

Early pregnancy care over time: should we promote an early pregnancy assessment unit?

Open access
van den Berg, Merel M.J., Goddijn, Mariette, Ankum, Willem M., van Woerden, Emmy E., van der Veen, Fulco, van Wely, Madelon, Hajenius, Petra J.·2015·Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Abstract

In this observational study, the effect of the introduction of the first Early Pregnancy Assessment Unit (EPAU) in a university hospital in The Netherlands in 2008 on early pregnancy care is analysed. Derivatives of quality of care were measured before and after the establishment of the EPAU, with the aim of reducing unnecessary care. Care within three time periods was measured: 2006, 2009 and 2012. In 2006, 14% of women who had experienced a miscarriage were admitted to the hospital, whereas in 2009 and 2012 no women were admitted. The surgical management rate for miscarriage decreased from 79% (2006) to 6% (2009) and 28% (2012). Karyotyping of couples who had experienced recurrent miscarriage decreased from 100% (2006) to 17% (2009) and 33% (2012). The surgical management rate for ectopic pregnancy decreased from 50% (2006) to 25% (2009) and 29% (2012). The mean total cost per woman treated in 2006 was €1111 (95% CI €808 to 1426), €436 (95% CI €307 to 590) in 2009 and €633 (95% CI €586 to 788) in 2012. We can therefore conclude that an EPAU results in higher quality and cost-effective care, and has a positive effect on early pregnancy care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.04.008

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is growing evidence that preterm infants born after spontaneous preterm labour have a lower mean birthweight than what would be expected for their gestation.

    “There is growing evidence that preterm infants born after spontaneous preterm labour have a lower mean birthweight than what would be expected for their gestation. 104-106”

    From Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss (2021) · cites this paper as [105]

    The Materials and methods and Results passages address care for miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy, not outcomes of spontaneous preterm labour. Searches for the quoted claim and for birthweight, gestational age, and spontaneous preterm labour found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed birthweight difference; no page numbers were provided. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 32

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, 2012. Ectopic preg- nancy mortality -Florida. In pp. 106-109.

Authors
van den Berg, M. M. J., Goddijn, M., Ankum, W. M., van Woerden, E. E., van der Veen, F., van Wely, M., & Hajenius, P. J.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
192-198
ISSN
1472-6483 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1530667626
Cited by
32
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
early pregnancy care, miscarriage, recurrent pregnancy loss, ectopic pregnancy, karyology, unnecessary care, cost-effectiveness, quality of care, hospitalization
MeSH terms
Abortion, Habitual, Female, Humans, Karyotyping, Netherlands, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Ectopic, Health Care Costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review