Cited by 2Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsSurgical site infection preventionFoot and Ankle Surgery

Cirugía del lado erróneo: implicación del paciente y los profesionales. Experiencia en la Cirugía Mayor Ambulatoria de la Unidad del Pie

Asunción Márquez, J., López Gutiérrez, A., Pérez Martínez, V., Poggio Cano, D., Combalia, A.·2012·Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología

Abstract

Surgery of the wrong side is a very uncommon complication in orthopaedic surgery, but with serious consequences for the patient, the surgeon and the health institution, having to put all the necessary measures in place to prevent this occurring. We have conducted a prospective study on the introduction of a protocol to prevent surgery of the wrong side in 101 patients operated on for any foot disease in the Major Surgery Ambulatory Unit, performing three independent controls to verify the side: by the patient, by the nurse and by the anaesthetist. We review the information available of the side in the medical records and their correlation with the side operated on. Almost a quarter of the patients, 24.8%, were not informed that they had to make a mark on the foot to be operated on. No mark was made by 18.4% of the patients informed to do so, with no relationship between age, gender, education level, to live alone or previous foot operations. There was a lack of noting the side in the documentation, with this omission being more frequent in the Orthopaedic and Traumatology and Anaesthesiology medical records. Nine cases of inconsistency in the surgical side were detected, all in patients who had previous surgery in any foot. Marking of the side has been incorporated as routine practice in foot surgery, being beneficial for the safety of the patient, and should become normal practice in all surgical areas in the near future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.recot.2011.08.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Asunción Márquez, J., López Gutiérrez, A., Pérez Martínez, V., Poggio Cano, D., & Combalia, A.
Venue
Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
104-114
ISSN
1888-4415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002971150
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
Keywords
wrong-site surgery, foot surgery, surgical site marking, patient safety, clinical documentation, patient information, outpatient surgery, orthopedic surgery
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ambulatory Surgical Procedures, Female, Foot, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Medical Errors, Orthopedic Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review