Cross-sectional facts for macroeconomists
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In most high-income countries, economic inequality has risen substantially in recent decades.
“In most high-income countries, economic inequality has risen substantially in recent decades (see for example Krueger et al. 2010).”
From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Krueger et al. 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blanden, J., Doepke, M., & Stuhler, J. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29979 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Krueger, D., Perri, F., Pistaferri, L., & Violante, G. L.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Violante, Giovanni L.
- Venue
- Review of Economic Dynamics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 1094-2025 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010173533
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 40.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Review of Economic Dynamics (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
- Keywords
- income inequality, wage inequality, skill premium, gender pay gap, consumption inequality, wealth inequality, cross-national comparison, government redistribution, tax and transfer policy, cohort effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review