Cited by 97Pain Management and TreatmentSpinal Cord Injury ResearchVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Virtual reality for spinal cord injury-associated neuropathic pain: Systematic review

Open access
Chi, B., Chau, B., Yeo, E., Ta, P.·2019·Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Abstract

Background Treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI)-associated neuropathic pain is challenging, with limited efficacy and no definitive options, and SCI patients often show resistance to pharmacologic treatment. Virtual reality (VR) therapy is a non-invasive, non-pharmacologic alternative with minimal adverse effects.Objective To investigate the effect of VR therapy on SCI-associated neuropathic pain in a systematic review.Methods Articles needed to 1) be written in English; 2) include adult subjects, with at least half the study population with a SCI diagnosis; 3) involve any form of VR therapy; and 4) assess neuropathic pain by quantitative outcome measures. Articles were searched in MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL®, EMBASE, and PsycINFO up to April 2018. Reference lists of retrieved articles were hand-searched. Methodologic quality was assessed by the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Score (PEDro) for randomized controlled trials and Modified Downs and Black Tool (D&B) for all other studies. Level of evidence was determined by using a modified Sackett scale.Results Among 333 studies identified, 9 included in this review (n=150 participants) evaluated 4 methods of VR therapy (virtual walking, VR-augmented training, virtual illusion, and VR hypnosis) for treating neuropathic pain in SCI patients. Each VR method reduced neuropathic pain: 4 studies supported virtual walking, and the other 3 VR methods were each supported by a different study. Combined treatment with virtual walking and transcranial direct current stimulation was the most effective. The quality of studies was a major limitation.Conclusion VR therapy could reduce SCI-associated neuropathic pain, although the clinical significance of this analgesic effect is unclear. Clinical trials evaluating VR therapy as standalone and/or adjunct therapy for neuropathic pain in SCI patients are warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.09.006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This finding is similar to a former study where a patient with at-level pain and the longest time since SCI also profited the most from the therapy.

    “This finding is similar to a former study where a patient with at-level pain and the longest time since SCI also profited the most from the therapy [7, 21].”

    From Virtual walking therapy in neuropathic spinal cord injury pain: a feasibility study (2024) · cites this paper as [21]

    In “Important demographic information varied between studies” (page unavailable), the review suggests that VR therapy may have a greater impact further from injury, and its References identify a study of at-level neuropathic pain. It does not report that the patient with at-level pain who had the longest time since SCI benefited the most. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 97

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Chau B, Phelan I, Dunn J, Yeo E, Hata JHS. Immersive Virtual Reality Therapy for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Case Report; 93. 2017;p. 56. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000704. · DOI
  2. Lo ¨fgren M, Norrbrink C. But I know what works'' -patients' experience of spinal cord injury neuropathic pain management Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:2139-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012. 46 6761. · DOI
  3. Downs S, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Commu- nity Heal 1998;52:377-84.
  4. Bryce TN. Spinal Cord Injury Braddom's Phys. Med. Rehabil, 5th ed., Phila- delphia: Elsevier; 2016. p. 1095-136.

Authors
Chi, B., Chau, B., Yeo, E., & Ta, P.
Affiliations
  • Loma Linda University Medical Center (US)
  • Loma Linda University (US)
Corresponding author
Chi, B.
ORCID
Chi, B.
Venue
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
49-57
ISSN
1877-0657 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2897749152
Cited by
97
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Loma Linda University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
virtual reality therapy, spinal cord injury, neuropathic pain, virtual walking, transcranial direct current stimulation, non-pharmacological pain management, analgesia
MeSH terms
Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Neuralgia, Spinal Cord Injuries, Treatment Outcome, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review