Cited by 25Religious Studies and Spiritual PracticesIndian and Buddhist StudiesReligion and Society Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modernity and its imbalances: Constructing modern selfhood in the Mata Amritanandamayi Mission

Open access
Warrier, Maya·2006·Religion

Abstract

This article explores the orientations towards ‘modernity’ among devotees of the popular female guru in contemporary India, Mata Amritanandamayi. It examines the understanding of modernity popularised by this guru and shows how this understanding informs the world views and lifestyles of her Indian followers. These followers, most of them educated, middle-class urbanites, are exposed to modernity in their everyday lives. The understanding of modernity in the guru's fold leads devotees to idealise a form of selfhood that allows expression for their faith and emotions and that thereby facilitates the transcendence of the so-called ‘imbalances' of modern personalities and lifestyles. The realisation of this form of selfhood does not mean a rejection of modernity. Instead, it purportedly better equips followers to cope with the stresses of modernity. This article analyses the logic that underpins this view of modernity, and the different interpretations, within this guru's fold, of the modern West and of its relationship to India.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.religion.2006.09.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Appadurai A., 1990, Language and the Politics of Emotion, 92
  2. Appadurai A., 1996, Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization
  3. Babb L., 1987, Redemptive Encounters: Three Modern Styles in the Hindu Tradition
  4. Bourdieu P., 1977, Outline of a Theory of Practice, 10.1017/CBO9780511812507 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1006/reli.1998.0132 · DOI
  6. 10.1017/CBO9780511488221 · DOI
  7. Comaroff J., 1993, Modernity and its Malcontents: Ritual and Power in Post-Colonial Africa
  8. 10.1080/13537909508580732 · DOI
  9. Eisenstadt S.N., 2000, Daedalus, 129, 1
  10. Exon B., 1997, Scottish Journal of Religious Studies, 18, 163
  11. Faavret-Saada J., 1980, Deadly Words: Witchcraft in the Bocage
  12. Gellner E., 1992, Reason and Culture: The Historic Role of Rationality and Rationalism
  13. 10.4324/9780203410431 · DOI
  14. Gerth H.H., 1958, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology
  15. Giddens A., 1990, The Consequences of Modernity
  16. 10.1215/08992363-11-1-1 · DOI
  17. Heelas P., 1996, The New Age Movement: The Celebration of Self and the Sacralization of Modernity
  18. Hirschkind C., 2002, A Reader in the Anthropology of Religion, 536
  19. Hollis M., 1982, Rationality and Relativism
  20. Kakar S., 1984, Shamans, Mystics and Doctors: A Psychological Inquiry into India and its Healing Traditions
  21. Knauft B.M., 2002, Critically Modern: Alternatives, Alterities, Anthropologies
  22. 10.1177/0725513600061000004 · DOI
  23. Luhrmann T.M., 1989, Persuasions of the Witch's Craft: Ritual Magic and Witchcraft in Present-Day England
  24. McKean L., 1996, Divine Enterprise: Gurus and the Hindu Nationalist Movement
  25. Mendelsohn E., 1993, Fundamentalism and Society, 23
  26. Miller D., 1994, Modernity: An Ethnographic Approach. Dualism and Mass Consumption in Trinidad
  27. Parry J., 1985, Reason and Morality, 200
  28. Pinches M., 1999, Culture and Privilege in Capitalist Asia
  29. 10.1177/006996689023001004 · DOI
  30. Robertson R., 1995, Global Modernities, 25, 10.4135/9781446250563.n2 · DOI
  31. Singer M., 1972, When a Great Tradition Modernizes
  32. 10.1017/S0026749X0000072X · DOI
  33. Tambiah S.J., 1990, Magic, Science and Religion and the Scope of Rationality
  34. Tambiah S.J., 2000, Daedalus, 129, 163
  35. Taussig M., 1980, The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America
  36. 10.1016/S0048-721X(02)00080-5 · DOI
  37. Varma P.K., 1998, The Great Indian Middle Class
  38. 10.1017/S0026749X03001070 · DOI
  39. Warrier M., 2003, Hinduism in Public and Private, 254
  40. Wilson B.R., 1970, Rationality
  41. Wittrock B., 2000, Daedalus, 129, 31

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Warrier, M.
Affiliations
University of Wales (GB)
Corresponding author
Warrier, Maya
Venue
Religion
Published
2006-12
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
179-195
ISSN
  • 0048-721X (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-1151
OpenAlex
W2026504069
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Religion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
modernity, selfhood, guru-disciple relationship, religious devotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review