Cited by 102Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesMicrobial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bio-hydrogen production from food waste and sewage sludge in the presence of aged refuse excavated from refuse landfill

Li, Ming, Zhao, Youcai, Guo, Qiang, Qian, Xiaoqing, Niu, Dongjie·2008·Renewable Energy

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.renene.2008.02.018

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Terentiew A, Bagley DM. Production of hydrogen under anaerobic conditions: effects of pre-treatment and operating conditions. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual WEAO technical symposium, March 31–April 2, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2003.
  2. Iyer, 2004, Hydrogen gas production in a continuous flow bioreactor using heat-treated soil inocula, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 89, 119
  3. Lay, 1999, Feasibility of biological hydrogen production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste, Water Res, 33, 2579, 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00483-7 · DOI
  4. Xiao N. Organic wastewater acid fermentation theory and control measure. Dr. degree's Thesis, Harbin University of Civil Engineering and Architecture; 1996.
  5. Li JZ. The bio-producing hydrogen process of organic wastewater treatment. Dr. degree's Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology; 1999. p. 9.
  6. Wang, 2003, Producing hydrogen from wastewater sludge by Clostridium bifermentans, J Biotechnol, 102, 83, 10.1016/S0168-1656(03)00007-5 · DOI
  7. Cai, 2004, Progress of studies on biological hydrogen production by anaerobic fermentative process utilizing wastewater and solid wastes, Tech Equip Environ Pollut Control, 6, 1
  8. Okamoto, 2000, Biological hydrogen potential of material characteristic of the organic fraction of municipals solid wastes, Water Sci Technol, 41, 25, 10.2166/wst.2000.0052 · DOI
  9. Liu BM. Agricultural solid anaerobic fermentation for Biological hydrogen production. Masters Thesis, Zhengzhou University; 2003. p. 5.

Metadata

Authors
Li, M., Zhao, Y., Guo, Q., Qian, X., & Niu, D.
Affiliations
Tongji University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Ming
Venue
Renewable Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
33
Issue
12
Pages
2573-2579
ISSN
0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974660916
Cited by
102
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
12.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Renewable Energy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
Keywords
biohydrogen production, food waste, sewage sludge, aged refuse, microbial inoculum, biogas, acidification, sterilization, hydrogen production kinetics, waste-to-energy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review