Projected impacts of climate change on wind energy density in the United States
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Wind power does not require water.
“In contrast, wind power does not require water [145].”
From Energy system resilience – A review (2021) · cites this paper as [145]
Most existing studies report a change in annual wind power output variation of less than 15% depending on the location.
“Most existing studies report a change in annual wind power output variation to be less than 15% depending on the location [21,22,145,148].”
From Energy system resilience – A review (2021) · cites this paper as [145]
Studies on the effects of climate change on wind resources are ample but subject to high uncertainties and a lack of agreement between results from different models.
“The number of studies on the effects of climate change on wind resources is ample, but they are subject to high uncertainties and a lack of agreement between results from different models [145].”
From Energy system resilience – A review (2021) · cites this paper as [145]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Energy system resilience – A review
Jasiūnas, J., Lund, P. D., & Mikkola, J. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111476 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
“Most existing studies report a change in annual wind power output variation to be less than 15% depending on the location [21,22,145,148].”
BackgroundResultClimate change impacts on wind power generation.
Pryor, S. C., Barthelmie, R. J., Bukovsky, M. S., Leung, L. R., & Sakaguchi, K. (2020) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-020-0101-7 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
- Authors
- Johnson, D. L., & Erhardt, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Wake Forest University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Erhardt, Robert J.
- Venue
- Renewable Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 66-73
- ISSN
- 0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1932281095
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Renewable Energy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wake Forest University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Wind Energy Research and Development
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Energy Load and Power Forecasting
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Keywords
- climate change impacts, wind power density, regional climate model, NARCCAP, continental United States, wind energy potential, model agreement, Kansas, Oklahoma, northern Texas
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
