The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of different time series aggregation methods on optimal energy system design
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Modeling renewable energy systems is a computationally-demanding task due to the high fluctuation of supply and demand time series. To reduce the scale of these, this paper discusses different methods for their aggregation into typical periods. Each aggregation method is applied to a different type of energy system model, making the methods fairly incomparable. To overcome this, the different aggregation methods are first extended so that they can be applied to all types of multidimensional time series and then compared by applying them to different energy system configurations and analyzing their impact on the cost optimal design. It was found that regardless of the method, time series aggregation allows for significantly reduced computational resources. Nevertheless, averaged values lead to underestimation of the real system cost in comparison to the use of representative periods from the original time series. The aggregation method itself e.g., k-means clustering plays a minor role. More significant is the system considered: Energy systems utilizing centralized resources require fewer typical periods for a feasible system design in comparison to systems with a higher share of renewable feed-in. Furthermore, for energy systems based on seasonal storage, currently existing models integration of typical periods is not suitable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means
Jain, A. K. (2010) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011 · Cited by 9,368
Control of systems integrating logic, dynamics, and constraints
Bemporad, A., & Morari, M. (1999) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(98)00178-2 · Cited by 3,066
Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review
Baños, R., Manzano-Agugliaro, F., Montoya, F. G., Gil, C., Alcayde, A., & Gómez, J. (2011) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.12.008 · Cited by 1,646
MES (multi-energy systems): An overview of concepts and evaluation models
Mancarella, P. (2014) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.041 · Cited by 1,427
Pyomo: modeling and solving mathematical programs in Python
Hart, W. E., Watson, J.-P., & Woodruff, D. L. (2011) · Mathematical Programming Computation · doi:10.1007/s12532-011-0026-8 · Cited by 1,201
Optimal Power Flow of Multiple Energy Carriers
Geidl, M., & Andersson, G. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2006.888988 · Cited by 1,100
Schiebahn, S., Grube, T., Robinius, M., Tietze, V., Kumar, B., & Stolten, D. (2015) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.01.123 · Cited by 823
Self-citationClustering Rules: A Comparison of Partitioning and Hierarchical Clustering Algorithms
Reynolds, A. P., Richards, G., de la Iglesia, B., & Rayward-Smith, V. J. (2006) · Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Algorithms · doi:10.1007/s10852-005-9022-1 · Cited by 578
Poncelet, K., Höschle, H., Delarue, E. D., et al. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2016.2596803 · Cited by 340
Carpe diem: A novel approach to select representative days for long-term power system modeling
Nahmmacher, P., Schmid, E., Hirth, L., & Knopf, B. (2016) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.06.081 · Cited by 286
Cited by
Brown, T., Schlachtberger, D., Kies, A., Schramm, S., & Greiner, M. (2018) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.222 · Cited by 836
Power-to-X: A review and perspective.
Palys, M. J., & Daoutidis, P. (2022) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107948 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Kotzur, L., Markewitz, P., Robinius, M., & Stolten, D.
- Venue
- Renewable Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 117
- Pages
- 474-487
- ISSN
- 0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2740319643
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 7.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of different time series aggregation methods on optimal energy system design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.017
- The paper
- Kotzur, L., Markewitz, P., Robinius, M., & Stolten, D. (2018). Impact of different time series aggregation methods on optimal energy system design. Renewable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.