The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anomaly detection and fault analysis of wind turbine components based on deep learning network
Abstract
Continuous monitoring of wind turbine health using early fault detection methods can improve turbine reliability and reduce maintenance costs before they reach a catastrophic stage. To achieve anomaly detection and fault analysis of wind turbine components, this paper proposes a deep learning method based on a deep auto-encoder (DAE) network using operational supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) data of wind turbines. First, a component DAE network model using multiple restricted Boltzmann machines (RBM) was constructed. Previously collected normal SCADA data from wind turbines were used to train this multilayer network model layer-wise to extract the relationships between SCADA variables. Then, a reconstruction error (Re) was calculated by using the DAE network input and its output reconstruction value, which was defined as the condition detection index to reflect the component health condition. Due to the acute changes and disturbances of wind speed in actual operation, the calculated detection index always has an extreme distribution that can cause false alarms. Therefore, an adaptive threshold determined by the extreme value theory was proposed and used as the rule of anomaly judgement. The method can not only implement early warning of fault components but also deduce the physical location of a faulted component by DAE residuals. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method was verified by some reported failure cases of wind turbine components.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Deep learning-based classification of hyperspectral data
Chen, Y., Lin, Z., Zhao, X., Wang, G., & Gu, Y. (2014) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2014.2329330 · Cited by 2,679
Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral data based on deep belief network
Chen, Y., Zhao, X., & Jia, X. (2015) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2015.2388577 · Cited by 1,259
Cited by
Xiang, L., Wang, P., Yang, X., Hu, A., & Su, H. (2021) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109094 · Cited by 406
Kong, Z., Tang, B., Deng, L., Liu, W., & Han, Y. (2020) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.033 · Cited by 258
Chen, H., Liu, H., Chu, X., Liu, Q., & Xue, D. (2021) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.078 · Cited by 253
Self-citationUsing SCADA Data for Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring: A Systematic Literature Review
Maldonado-Correa, J., Martín-Martínez, S., Artigao, E., & Gómez-Lázaro, E. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13123132 · Cited by 183
Online Learning of Oil Leak Anomalies in Wind Turbines with Block-Based Binary Reservoir
Cardoni, M., Pau, D. P., Falaschetti, L., Turchetti, C., & Lattuada, M. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10222836 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, H., Liu, H., Hu, W., & Yan, X.
- Venue
- Renewable Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 127
- Pages
- 825-834
- ISSN
- 0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2801050875
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anomaly detection and fault analysis of wind turbine components based on deep learning network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.024
- The paper
- Zhao, H., Liu, H., Hu, W., & Yan, X. (2018). Anomaly detection and fault analysis of wind turbine components based on deep learning network. Renewable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.