Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 19Forest Biomass Utilization and ManagementWood Residue Utilization and Solid BiofuelsRenewable energy and sustainable power systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Feasibility study on the production and consumption of wood pellets in Iran to meet return-on-investment and greenhouse gas emissions targets

Nabavi, Vahid, Azizi, Majid, Tarmian, Asghar, Ray, Charles David·2020·Renewable Energy

Abstract

Abstract At the Paris Agreement in 2015, Iran pledged a 4% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and bio-fuels like wood pellet are an option. To estimate the volume of waste woody biomass the International Energy Agency model was employed and results show that a total opportunity of 754,840 m3 of woody by-products. An economic feasibility study of wood pellet production was performed by calculating the economic indices and analyzing their sensitivity using COMFAR III software for three scenarios in annual capacities of 48,000, 75,000 and 120,000 tons. The costs of wood pellet production for each plan are 104.29, 107.63, and 106.92 €/Mt, respectively. Acceptable IRR (45%–124%) and NPV (7–14 Million Euro) support the feasibility of wood pellet production in Iran. Standard VDI 2067 used to calculate specific cost of generating energy with wood pellet fuel against domestic water boilers using diesel and natural gas fuels. Results showed that the cost of generating energy is higher by wood pellet (43.5 €/Mwh, against gasoline, 25.9 €/Mw, and natural gas, 22.3 €/Mwh) due to the high initial investment in the wood pellet-fired boilers compared to established fossil fuels and the low price of diesel and natural gas in Iran.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.140

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Khider, 2012, Heat value of four hardwood species from Sudan, J. For. Prod. Ind., 1, 5
  2. Shahinzadeh, H., Ghotb, H., Tavanarad, M., Feghhi, A., Hajahmadi, M. Estimating of potential to achieve electrical energy from biomass resources in Iran: a case study in Isfahan. J. Sci. Technol.,1(7), 322-328

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Nabavi, V., Azizi, M., Tarmian, A., & Ray, C. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Tehran (IR)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Nabavi, Vahid
Venue
Renewable Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
151
Pages
1-20
ISSN
0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981684024
Cited by
19
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Renewable Energy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
IRR
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Wood Residue Utilization and Solid Biofuels
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
Keywords
wood pellets, woody biomass, biofuels, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, economic feasibility, return on investment, net present value, internal rate of return, energy cost comparison, wood waste, Iran

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.