The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wind power forecasting – A data-driven method along with gated recurrent neural network
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Effective wind power prediction will facilitate the world’s long-term goal in sustainable development. However, a drawback of wind as an energy source lies in its high variability, resulting in a challenging study in wind power forecasting. To solve this issue, a novel data-driven approach is proposed for wind power forecasting by integrating data pre-processing & re-sampling, anomalies detection & treatment, feature engineering, and hyperparameter tuning based on gated recurrent deep learning models, which is systematically presented for the first time. Besides, a novel deep learning neural network of Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) is successfully developed and critically compared with the algorithm of Long Short-term Memory (LSTM). Initially, twelve features were engineered into the predictive model, which are wind speeds at four different heights, generator temperature, and gearbox temperature. The simulation results showed that, in terms of wind power forecasting, the proposed approach can capture a high degree of accuracy at lower computational costs. It can also be concluded that GRU outperformed LSTM in predictive accuracy under all observed tests, which provided faster training process and less sensitivity to noise in the used Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) datasets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
Prediction of two-phase flow patterns in upward inclined pipes via deep learning
Lin, Z., Liu, X., Lao, L., & Liu, H. (2020) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118541 · Cited by 142
Self-citation
Cited by
An edge-ai based forecasting approach for improving smart microgrid efficiency
Lv, L., Wu, Z., Zhang, L., Gupta, B. B., & Tian, Z. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2022.3163137 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Kisvari, A., Lin, Z., & Liu, X.
- Venue
- Renewable Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 163
- Pages
- 1895-1909
- ISSN
- 0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3095043043
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.