Cited by 84Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchImmunotoxicology and immune responsesToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Developmental Toxicity in white Leghorn Chickens Following in Ovo Exposure to Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS)

Peden-Adams, Margie M., Stuckey, Joyce E., Gaworecki, Kristen M., Berger-Ritchie, Jennifer, Bryant, Kathy, Jodice, Patrick G., Scott, Thomas R., Ferrario, Joseph B. +6 more·2009·Reproductive Toxicology

Abstract

Studies show that perfluorinated compounds cause various toxicological effects; nevertheless, effects on immune function and developmental endpoints have not been addressed at length. This study examined the effects of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in white leghorn hatchlings on various developmental, immunological, and clinical health parameters. In addition, serum PFOS concentrations were determined by LC/MS/MS. Embryonic day (ED) 0 eggs were injected with either safflower oil/10% DMSO (control, 0mg/kg egg wt) or PFOS in safflower oil/10% DMSO at 1, 2.5, or 5mg/kg egg wt, and the chicks were grown to post-hatch day (PHD) 14. Treatment with PFOS did not affect hatch rate. Following in ovo exposure chicks exhibited increases in spleen mass at all treatment levels, in liver mass at 2.5 and 5mg/kg egg wt, and in body length (crown-rump length) at the 5mg/kg treatment. Right wings were shorter in all treatments compared to control. Increases in the frequency of brain asymmetry were evident in all treatment groups. SRBC-specific immunoglobulin (IgM and IgY combined) titers were decreased significantly at all treatment levels, while plasma lysozyme activity was increased at all treatment levels. The PHA skin test response decreased in relation to increasing PFOS dose. Serum concentrations where significant immunological, morphological, and neurological effects were observed at the lowest dose (1mg/kg egg wt) averaged 154 ng PFOS/g serum. These concentrations fall within environmental ranges reported in blood samples from wild caught avian species; thereby, verifying that the environmental egg concentrations used for the injections do indeed relate to serum levels in hatchlings that are also environmentally relevant. These data indicate that immune alterations and brain asymmetry can occur in birds following in ovo exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations of PFOS and demonstrates the need for further research on the developmental effects of perfluorinated compounds in various species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.reprotox.2008.10.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In ovo exposure to a single dose of 1, 2.5, or 5 mg/kg egg weight of PFOS resulted in brain asymmetry in chickens at post-hatch day 14, although the severity of asymmetry was not dose-dependent.

    “Finally, in ovo exposure to a single dose of 1, 2.5, or 5 mg/kg egg weight of PFOS resulted in brain asymmetry in chickens at post-hatch day 14, although the severity of asymmetry was not dose-dependent (Peden-Adams et al., 2009).”
  • Elevated lysozyme activity has been reported in both mammalian and non-mammalian species exposed to PFAS.

    “elevated lysozyme activity, an antimicrobial enzyme and important biomarker of innate immune system function, has been reported in both mammalian and non-mammalian species exposed to PFAS”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 112 · Cited by 84

Authors
Peden-Adams, M. M., Stuckey, J. E., Gaworecki, K. M., Berger-Ritchie, J., Bryant, K., Jodice, P. G., Scott, T. R., Ferrario, J. B., Guan, B., Vigo, C., Boone, J. S., McGuinn, W. D., DeWitt, J. C., & Keil, D. E.
Affiliations
  • College of Charleston (US)
  • Clemson University (US)
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (US)
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
  • East Carolina University (US)
Venue
Reproductive Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
27
Issue
3-4
Pages
307-318
ISSN
0890-6238 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057785422
Cited by
84
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reproductive Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
PFOS, perfluorinated compounds, in ovo exposure, developmental toxicity, White Leghorn chickens, hatchlings, splenic mass, liver mass, body length, wing asymmetry, brain asymmetry, lysozyme activity, environmental exposure
MeSH terms
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced, Animals, Chick Embryo, Chickens, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Environmental Pollutants, Female, Fluorocarbons, Liver, Organ Size, Ovum, Spleen, Wings, Animal, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Crown-Rump Length, Embryonic Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review