Cited by 118Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Gestational and Lactational Exposure to Potassium Perfluorooctanesulfonate (K+PFOS) in Rats: Toxicokinetics, Thyroid Hormone Status, and Related Gene Expression

Chang, Shu-Ching, Ehresman, David J., Bjork, James A., Wallace, Kendall B., Parker, George A., Stump, Donald G., Butenhoff, John L.·2009·Reproductive Toxicology

Abstract

Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS), a persistent and accumulative compound, is widely distributed in humans and wildlife. Human exposure can occur early in development, as evidenced by the detection of PFOS in umbilical cord blood and breast milk. As part of a developmental neurotoxicology study for which developmental endpoints, including those related to the developing nervous system, have been reported separately, groups of 25 pregnant Sprague Dawley rats were given daily oral doses of either vehicle control or potassium PFOS (K(+)PFOS) at 0.1, 0.3, and 1.0mg/kg-d from gestation day (GD) 0 (day positive for mating) through postnatal day (PND) 20. An additional 10 pregnant females per treatment group were treated through GD 19 and sacrificed on GD 20 in order to obtain maternal and fetal serum and tissue samples at the end of gestation. The present paper reports the results of samples of serum, liver, brain, and thyroid glands taken at various times to evaluate: (1) serum, liver, and brain PFOS concentrations by LC-MS/MS to establish the relationship between PFOS concentrations and study outcomes; (2) serum thyrotropin (TSH) concentrations by RIA; (3) thyroid follicular cell proliferation index by Ki-67 immunohistochemical staining; (4) thyroid follicle epithelial cell height and colloidal area by histomorphometric analysis; (5) selected liver mRNA transcripts by quantitative RT-PCR. PFOS concentrations in dam and pup serum, liver, and brain increased across treatment groups in approximate proportion to the proportional increases in maternal K(+)PFOS dose, and sex differences in PFOS concentrations were not apparent in pups on PND 21. In pups from K(+)PFOS maternal dose groups on PND 72, serum PFOS had decreased to about 3 and 11% of PND 21 concentrations in males and females, respectively, and liver PFOS had decreased to about 17% of PND 21 concentrations in both sexes. Liver PFOS concentrations were approximately 0.6-0.8 times serum PFOS in GD 20 fetuses, and increased to about 2-4 times serum concentrations on PND 4 and 21. GD 20 fetal and PND 4 pup brain PFOS concentrations were approximately 33% of the corresponding serum concentrations, dropping to approximately 10% by PND 21, in contrast to dam brain PFOS concentrations, which were approximately 4-9% of serum PFOS concentrations. Compared to controls, Cyp2b2 mRNA was increased (2.8-fold) in the 1.0mg/kg-d treatment-group dams on GD 20. In male pups on PND 21, Cyp4A1, ACoA, and Cyp2b2 were increased 2.1-, 1.5-, and 1.8-fold, respectively, and Cyp7A1 was decreased 3.5-fold. Serum TSH and thyroid follicular morphology were not altered by K(+)PFOS treatment. The mean number of proliferating thyroid follicular cells was increased 2.1-fold over control in GD 20 female fetuses from 1.0mg/kg-d-treated dams, yet the highest individual count was similar to that of controls (116 versus 113 in controls).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.01.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 71 · Cited by 118

Authors
Chang, S.-C., Ehresman, D. J., Bjork, J. A., Wallace, K. B., Parker, G. A., Stump, D. G., & Butenhoff, J. L.
Affiliations
  • 3M (United States) (US)
  • University of Minnesota, Duluth (US)
Corresponding author
Butenhoff, John L.
Venue
Reproductive Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
27
Issue
3-4
Pages
387-399
ISSN
0890-6238 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057846222
Cited by
118
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reproductive Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Keywords
PFOS, perfluorinated compounds, prenatal exposure, lactational exposure, toxicokinetics, thyroid hormones, thyroid-stimulating hormone, hepatic gene expression, developmental neurotoxicity, persistent organic pollutants
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Environmental Pollutants, Female, Fluorocarbons, Gestational Age, Lactation, Male, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Thyroid Hormones, Thyroxine, Triiodothyronine, Gene Expression, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Maternal Exposure, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review