CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A comparative study of littering and waste in Singapore and Japan

Ong, Ivy Bee Luan, Sovacool, Benjamin K.·2012·Resources, Conservation and Recycling
DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.008

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Al-Khatib, 2009, Enhanced solid waste management by understanding the effects of gender, income, marital status, and religious convictions on attitudes and practices related to street littering in Nablus–Palestinian territory, Waste Management, 29, 449, 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.004 · DOI
  2. Al-Khatib, 2009, Children's perceptions and behavior with respect to glass littering in developing countries: a case study in Palestine's Nablus district, Waste Management, 29, 1434, 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.08.026 · DOI
  3. Armitage, 2000, The removal of urban litter from stormwater conduits and streams. Paper 1. The quantities involved and catchment litter management options, Water S A, 26
  4. Bremner, 2007, The world's most livable cities, Business Week
  5. Cialdini, 1990, A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015, 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Corraliza, 2000, Environmental values, beliefs, and actions: a situational approach, Environment and Behavior, 32, 832, 10.1177/00139160021972829 · DOI
  7. Crump, 1977, The effects of litter on littering behavior in a forest environment, Environment and Behavior, 9, 137, 10.1177/001391657791009 · DOI
  8. Dwyer, 1993, Critical review of behavioral interventions to preserve the environment: research since 1980, Environment and Behavior, 25, 275, 10.1177/0013916593255001 · DOI
  9. Finnie, 1973, Field experiments in litter control, Environment and Behavior, 5, 123, 10.1177/001391657300500201 · DOI
  10. Grasmick, 1991, Shame and embarrassment as deterrents to noncompliance with the law: the case of an antilittering campaign, Environment and Behavior, 23, 233, 10.1177/0013916591232006 · DOI
  11. Huffman, 1995, Litter reduction: a review and integration of the literature, Environment and Behavior, 27, 153, 10.1177/0013916595272003 · DOI
  12. Kort, 2008, Persuasive trash cans: activation of littering norms by design, Environment and Behavior, 40, 870, 10.1177/0013916507311035 · DOI
  13. Krauss, 1978, Field and laboratory studies of littering, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 122, 10.1016/0022-1031(78)90064-1 · DOI
  14. Meeker Frank, 1997, A comparison of table-littering behaviour in two settings: a case for a contextual research strategy, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 59, 10.1006/jevp.1996.0039 · DOI
  15. Porter, 1995, Solid waste recovery: a review of behavioral programs to increase recycling, Environment and Behavior, 27, 122, 10.1177/0013916595272002 · DOI
  16. Gareth, 1995, Marine litter monitoring programmes—a review of methods with special reference to national surveys, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 30, 103, 10.1016/0025-326X(94)00192-C · DOI
  17. Robinson, 1976, Littering in public places, Environment and Behavior, 8, 363, 10.1177/136327527600800303 · DOI
  18. Sibley, 2003, Differentiating active and passive littering, Environment and Behavior, 35, 415, 10.1177/0013916503035003006 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ong, I. B. L., & Sovacool, B. K.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
61
Pages
35-42
ISSN
0921-3449
DOI
10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.008
Cited by
46
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review