The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Better than bottled water?—Energy and climate change impacts of on-the-go drinking water stations
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A study by Makov et al. [41] showed that waterdispensing stations (e.g., Woosh) have the potential to reduce the adverse environmental impacts associated with the consumption of bottled water.”
From Characterisation and environmental value proposition of reuse models for fast-moving consumer goods: reusable packaging and products (2021) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cites
Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean
Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., Narayan, R., & Law, K. L. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1260352 · Cited by 13,163
Errors in Conventional and Input‐Output—based Life—Cycle Inventories
Lenzen, M. (2000) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/10881980052541981 · Cited by 792
Water as an essential nutrient: the physiological basis of hydration
Jéquier, E., & Constant, F. (2009) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/ejcn.2009.111 · Cited by 751
Peer Reviewed: Economic Input–Output Models for Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment
Hendrickson, C. T., Horvath, A., Joshi, S., & Lave, L. (1998) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es983471i · Cited by 677
Product Environmental Life‐Cycle Assessment Using Input‐Output Techniques
Joshi, S. (1999) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/108819899569449 · Cited by 573
Materials and the environment: eco-informed material choice
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-6823 · Cited by 530
Is Cumulative Fossil Energy Demand a Useful Indicator for the Environmental Performance of Products?
Huijbregts, M. A. J., Rombouts, L. J. A., Hellweg, S., Frischknecht, R., Hendriks, A. J., van de Meent, D., Ragas, A. M. J., Reijnders, L., & Struijś, J. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es051689g · Cited by 452
Majeau‐Bettez, G., Strømman, A. H., & Hertwich, E. G. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es201308x · Cited by 297
LCA tool for the environmental evaluation of potable water production
Vince, F., Aoustin, E., Bréant, P., & Marechal, F. M. A. (2008) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.021 · Cited by 259
Bottled Water: United States Consumers and Their Perceptions of Water Quality
Hu, Z., Morton, L. W., & Mahler, R. L. (2011) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph8020565 · Cited by 256
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Grady, 2012, Bottled water technology and its global ramifications: an overview, Int. Water Technol. J., 2, 185
- Jungbluth, N., 2006. Comparison of the environmental impact of drinking water vs. bottled mineral water. Manuscript for the SGWA information bulletin and gwa (Gas Water Sewage) Disponible sur: www.trinkwasser.ch.
- Tarantini, 2003, A life cycle assessment study of the environmental sustainability of domestic water saving techniques, Sustain. Plann. Dev., 6, 579
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Muranko, Ż., Tassell, C., Zeeuw van der Laan, A., & Aurisicchio, M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13052609 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Makov, T., Meylan, G., Powell, J. T., & Shepon, A.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Makov, Tamar
- Venue
- Resources Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 143
- Pages
- 320-328
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2555423214
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
- Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1122492)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Keywords
- bottled water, life cycle assessment, energy demand, climate change impacts, eco-efficiency, sustainable water use, environmental impact comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Better than bottled water?—Energy and climate change impacts of on-the-go drinking water stations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.010
- The paper
- Makov, T., Meylan, G., Powell, J. T., & Shepon, A. (2019). Better than bottled water?—Energy and climate change impacts of on-the-go drinking water stations. Resources Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.010
