The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring resource efficiency and circular economy: A market value approach
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Given an apparent gap in the literature on circularity and accountability, as well as a call for further studies on the re fl ections of accountability within the CE, this study provides empirical evidence to fi ll these gaps.”
From A qualitative examination of how accountability manifests itself in a circular economy (2023) · cites this paper as Di Maio et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“The contribution of this study is part of a larger conversation about the importance of accountability in achieving a CE paradigm, a topic that has been surprisingly overlooked in existing literature. (Di Maio et al. , 2017).”
From A qualitative examination of how accountability manifests itself in a circular economy (2023) · cites this paper as Di Maio et al., 2017
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Ayres, 1969, Production, consumption & externalities, Am. Econ. Rev., 59, 282
- Bare, 2003, TRACI—the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts, J. Ind. Ecol., 6, 49, 10.1162/108819802766269539 · DOI
- Di Maio, 2015, A robust indicator for promoting circular economy through recycling, J. Environ. Prot., 6, 1095, 10.4236/jep.2015.610096 · DOI
- European Environment Agency, (2015) More from less—material resource efficiency in Europe 2015 overview of policies, instruments and targets in 32 countries. doi:10.2800/240736. · DOI
- Figge, 2004, Value-oriented impact assessment: the economics of a new approach to impact assessment, J. Environ. Plan. Manage., 47, 921, 10.1080/0964056042000284901 · DOI
- Gordon, 2005, Metal stock and sustainability, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 103, 1209, 10.1073/pnas.0509498103 · DOI
- Yang, 2001, Chinese life cycle impact assessment factors, J. Environ. Sci., 13, 205
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Circular supply chain management: a definition and structured literature review
Farooque, M., Zhang, A., Thürer, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303 · Cited by 894
Vural Gursel, I., Elbersen, B., & Meesters, K. P. H. (2023) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107104 · Cited by 38
A qualitative examination of how accountability manifests itself in a circular economy
Kwarteng, A., Agyenim-Boateng, C., & Simpson, S. N. Y. (2023) · Journal of Global Responsibility · doi:10.1108/jgr-12-2021-0107 · Cited by 17
System innovation and life cycle thinking in packaging value chain: the circularity of plastics.
Foschi, E. (2020) · amsdottorato · doi:10.48676/unibo/amsdottorato/9460 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Di Maio, F., Rem, P. C., Baldé, K., & Polder, M.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 122
- Pages
- 163-171
- ISSN
- 0921-3449
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
