CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 26

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward design principles for sound e-waste governance: A research approach illustrated with the case of the Netherlands

Börner, Laura, Hegger, Dries L.T.·2018·Resources, Conservation and Recycling
DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.013

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Fig. 1 Research framework outlining the conceptual and methodological steps taken.
Fig. 1 Research framework outlining the conceptual and methodological steps taken.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Degree of ful fi lment of success conditions coupled with relatable governance characteristics.
Fig. 3 Degree of ful fi lment of success conditions coupled with relatable governance characteristics.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Agrawal, 2015, A literature review and perspectives in reverse logistics, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 97, 76, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.02.009 · DOI
  2. Arnouts, 2012, Analysing governance modes and shifts – Governance arrangements in Dutch nature policy, For. Policy Econ., 16, 43, 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.04.001 · DOI
  3. Awasthi, 2018, An overview of the potential of eco-friendly hybrid strategy for metal recycling from WEEE, Resourc. Conserv. Recycl., 126, 228, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.014 · DOI
  4. Bahers, 2018, Regional approach of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) management in France, Resourc. Conserv. Recycl., 129, 145, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.016 · DOI
  5. Bilotta, 2014, On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies, Environ. Sci. Policy, 42, 67, 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.05.010 · DOI
  6. Borthakur, 2017, Emerging trends in consumers’ E-waste disposal behaviour and awareness: a worldwide overview with special focus on India, Resour. Conserv. Recy., 117, 102, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.011 · DOI
  7. Cahill, 2011, Review article: extended producer responsibility for packaging wastes and WEEE − a comparison of implementation and the role of local authorities across Europe, Waste Manag. Res., 29, 455, 10.1177/0734242X10379455 · DOI
  8. Driessen, 2012, Towards a conceptual framework for the study of shifts in modes of environmental governance − experiences from The Netherlands, Environ. Policy Gov., 22, 143, 10.1002/eet.1580 · DOI
  9. European Union, 2012, Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE), Offic. J. Eur. Union
  10. Favot, 2015, Why manufacturers of electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) create producer responsibility organizations (pros) to comply with the WEEE directive? The case of ERP Italia SRL with focus on costs, Environ. Eng. Manag. J., 14, 1595, 10.30638/eemj.2015.171 · DOI
  11. Govindan, 2015, Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: a comprehensive review to explore the future, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 240, 603, 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.012 · DOI
  12. Haddaway, 2014, The policy role of systematic reviews: past, present and future, Springer Sci. Rev., 2, 179, 10.1007/s40362-014-0023-1 · DOI
  13. Hickle, 2014, An examination of governance within extended producer responsibility policy regimes in North America, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 92, 55, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.08.007 · DOI
  14. Hysing, 2009, From government to governance? A comparison of environmental governing in swedish forestry and transport, Governance, 22, 647, 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01457.x · DOI
  15. Janse, 2010, A reverse logistics diagnostic tool: the case of the consumer electronics industry, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 47, 495, 10.1007/s00170-009-2333-z · DOI
  16. Johnson, 2018, Modelling the levels of historic waste electrical and electronic equipment in Ireland, Resour. Conserv. Recy., 131, 1, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.11.029 · DOI
  17. Khetriwal, 2011, One WEEE, many species: lessons from the european experience, Waste Manag. Res., 29, 954, 10.1177/0734242X11413327 · DOI
  18. Kiddee, 2013, Electronic waste management approaches: an overview, Waste Manag., 33, 1237, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.006 · DOI
  19. Kilic, 2015, Reverse logistics system design for the waste of electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) in Turkey, Resour. Conserv. Recy., 95, 120, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.010 · DOI
  20. Kissling, 2013, Success factors and barriers in re-use of electrical and electronic equipment, Resour. Conserv. Recy., 80, 21, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.07.009 · DOI
  21. Kumar, 2018, Evaluating critical barriers to implementation of WEEE management using DEMATEL approach, Resour. Conserv. Recy., 131, 101, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.024 · DOI
  22. Kumar, 2008, Cradle to cradle: reverse logistics strategies and opportunities across three industry sectors, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 115, 305, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.11.015 · DOI
  23. Kumar, 2017, E-waste: an overview on generation, collection, legislation and recycling practices, Resour. Conserv. Recy., 122, 32, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.018 · DOI
  24. Mayers, 2013, Producer responsibility organizations development and operations, J. Ind. Ecol., 17, 277, 10.1111/jiec.12021 · DOI
  25. Meadowcroft, 2007, Who is in charge here? governance for sustainable development in a complex world, J. Environ. Policy Plan., 9, 299, 10.1080/15239080701631544 · DOI
  26. Mol, 2000, Ecological modernisation theory in debate: a review, Environ. Polit., 9, 17, 10.1080/09644010008414511 · DOI
  27. O’Rourke, 2014, The science of sustainable supply Chains, Science, 344, 1124, 10.1126/science.1248526 · DOI
  28. Ongondo, 2011, How are WEEE doing? A global review of the management of electrical and electronic wastes, Waste Manag., 31, 714, 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.023 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Parajuly, 2017, Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) in Denmark: flows, quantities and management, Resour. Conserv. Recy., 123, 85, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.004 · DOI
  30. Queiruga, 2012, Evolution of the electronic waste management system in Spain, J. Clean. Prod., 24, 56, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.043 · DOI
  31. Reckwitz, 2002, Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing, Eur. J. Soc. Theory, 5, 243, 10.1177/13684310222225432 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Sarkis, 2010, Reverse logistics and social sustainability, Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., 17, 337, 10.1002/csr.220 · DOI
  33. Schot, 2008, Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy, Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag., 20, 537, 10.1080/09537320802292651 · DOI
  34. Scruggs, 2016, Improving information flow on chemicals in electronic products and E-waste to minimize negative consequences for health and the environment, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 113, 149, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.009 · DOI
  35. Spaargaren, 2011, Theories of practices Agency, technology, and culture. Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order, Glob. Environ. Change, 21, 813, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.010 · DOI
  36. Tenbensel, 2005, Multiple modes of governance −Disentangling the alternatives to hierarchies and markets, Public Manag. Rev., 7, 267, 10.1080/14719030500091566 · DOI
  37. Tonjes, 2012, A review of national municipal solid waste generation assessments in the USA, Waste Manag. Res., 30, 758, 10.1177/0734242X12451305 · DOI
  38. Vermeulen, 2015, Improving sustainability in global supply chains with private certification standards: testing an approach for assessing their performance and impact potential, Int. J. Bus. Glob., 14, 226
  39. Wittstruck, 2012, Understanding the success factors of sustainable supply chain management: empirical evidence from the electrics and electronics industry, Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., 19, 141, 10.1002/csr.261 · DOI
  40. Ylä-Mella, 2014, Implementation of waste electrical and electronic equipment directive in Finland: evaluation of the collection network and challenges of the effective WEEE management, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 86, 38, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.02.001 · DOI
  41. Young, 2003, Environmental governance: the role of institutions in causing and confronting environmental problems, Int. Environ. Agreements Polit. Law Econ., 3, 377, 10.1023/B:INEA.0000005802.86439.39 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 26

Metadata

Authors
Börner, L., & Hegger, D. L. T.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
134
Pages
271-281
ISSN
0921-3449
DOI
10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.013
Cited by
26
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review