CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1International Science and DiplomacyInternational Relations and Foreign PolicyCentral Asia Education and Culture

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

EU-India relations in the multi-vector matrix of science diplomacy and Asia-Europe Meeting

Open access
Šime, Zane·2021·Research in Globalization
DOI 10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100057
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Online training events deserve more attention as a form of people-to-people connectivity. The purpose of the article is to elaborate on how online training events gain prominence in the context of the COVID-19 imposed restrictions on geographical mobility. The autoethnographic account provides new ideas on what higher education extra-curricular and capacity building activities should be taken into consideration when taking a comprehensive look at people-to-people sustainable connectivity. As the analysed three online training events that took place over the summer 2020 show, these virtual occasions of people-to-people connectivity are promising building blocks for the future exploration of the EU structural diplomacy towards India both in a bilateral setting and multilateral context of Asia-Europe Meeting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100057

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 1

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Adams, T. E., Ellis, C., & Holman Jones, S. (2017). Autoethnography. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0011. · DOI
  2. Ayhan, 2019, The Boundaries of Public Diplomacy and Nonstate Actors: A Taxonomy of Perspectives, International Studies Perspectives, 20, 63, 10.1093/isp/eky010 · DOI
  3. Barston, R. P. (2019). Modern Diplomacy (5th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge. · DOI
  4. Becker, W., Dominguez-Torreiro, M., Neves, A.R., Tacao Moura, C. J., Saisana, M. (2018). Exploring ASEM Sustainable Connectivity – What brings Asia and Europe together? https://doi.org/10.2760/780021. · DOI
  5. Dall, 2021, Using Future Scenarios of Science Diplomacy for Addressing Global Challenges, Science Diplomacy Review, 3, 67
  6. De Lombaerde, P., Saucedo Acosta, E. J., Fernández Moriana, V., & Melissa Vida, A. (2017). Introduction: Indicator-Based Monitoring of Regional Economic Integration. In P. De Lombaerde & E. J. Saucedo Acosta (Eds.), Indicator-Based Monitoring of Regional Economic Integration: Fourth World Report on Regional Integration (pp. xv–xxxiv). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50860-3. · DOI
  7. Delreux, 2017, Informal division of labour in EU foreign policy-making, Journal of European Public Policy, 24, 1471, 10.1080/13501763.2016.1216151 · DOI
  8. Denshire, 2013, Conceptualizing autoethnography as assemblage: Accounts of occupational therapy practice, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 221, 10.1177/160940691301200110 · DOI
  9. Dent, 2001, ASEM and the “Cinderella Complex” of EU - East Asia Economic Relations, Pacific Affairs, 74, 25, 10.2307/2672486 · DOI
  10. Doidge, 2019, ASEM’s First Two Decades: A Role Discovered, Baltic Journal of European Studies, 9, 6, 10.1515/bjes-2019-0011 · DOI
  11. Drieskens, 2017, Golden or Gilded Jubilee? A Research Agenda for Actorness, Journal of European Public Policy, 24, 1534, 10.1080/13501763.2016.1225784 · DOI
  12. Ege, 2020, What International Bureaucrats (Really) Want, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 26, 577, 10.1163/19426720-02604003 · DOI
  13. Ingenhoff, D., Calamai, G., & Sevin, E. (2021). Key Influencers in Public Diplomacy 2.0: A Country-Based Social Network Analysis. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120981053. · DOI
  14. Jana, T., Kononenko, V., Navarra, C., Stamegna, C., & Zumer, K. (2020). Slowing down or changing track? Understanding the dynamics of “Slowbalisation” (In-Depth Analysis No. PE 659.383). Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service. https://doi.org/10.2861/914072. · DOI
  15. Kavalski, 2016, The EU–India Strategic Partnership: Neither Very Strategic, nor Much of a Partnership, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29, 192, 10.1080/09557571.2015.1007031 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Lam, 2021, United by the global COVID-19 pandemic: Divided by our values and viral identities, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, 1
  17. Lytras, 2021, Lockdowns and the COVID-19 pandemic: What is the endgame?, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 49, 37, 10.1177/1403494820961293 · DOI
  18. Martens, P., Caselli, M., De Lombaerde, P., Figge, L., & Scholte, J. A. (2015). New Directions in Globalization Indices. Globalizations, 12(2), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2014.944336. · DOI
  19. Meyer, N., Bertelsen, R. G., Czajkowska, N., Dall, E., Elorza, A., Josten, M., … Mays, C. (2021). A New Generation of Trainings on Science Diplomacy for Global Challenges: Insights from two European Projects. Science Diplomacy Review, 3(1), 25–34. Retrieved from https://fisd.in/sites/default/files/SDR_April 2021-min.pdf.
  20. Neubert, 2021, “Pocketing” Research Data? Ethnographic Data Production as Material Theorizing, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 50, 99, 10.1177/0891241620968262 · DOI
  21. Olivié, 2020, Is this the end of globalization (as we know it)?, Globalizations, 17, 990, 10.1080/14747731.2020.1716923 · DOI
  22. Onestini, C. (2015). How Do We Assess Cooperation Between Regional Organisations? EU and ASEAN as an Example of Region-to-Region Cooperation. In L. Brennan & P. Murray (Eds.), Drivers of Integration and Regionalism in Europe and Asia: Comparative Perspectives (pp. 252–269). London; New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315744193. · DOI
  23. Pacheco-Vega, 2019, Writing Field Notes and Using Them to Prompt Scholarly Writing, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1, 10.1177/1609406919840093 · DOI
  24. Pisani-Ferry, J. (2018). Should We Give Up on Global Governance? (Bruegel Policy Contribution No. 17). Brussels: Bruegel. Retrieved from https://www.bruegel.org/2018/10/should-we-give-up-on-global-governance/. · DOI
  25. Ploder, A., & Hamann, J. (2021). Practices of Ethnographic Research: Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 50(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241620979100. · DOI
  26. Reinalda, 2020, Institutional Development of the United Nations Secretariat, Global Governance, 26, 325, 10.1163/19426720-02602005 · DOI
  27. Roig, 2020, Barcelona’s science diplomacy: Towards an ecosystem-driven internationalization strategy, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7, 1, 10.1057/s41599-020-00602-y · DOI
  28. Schiefloe, 2021, The Corona crisis: A wicked problem, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 49, 5, 10.1177/1403494820970767 · DOI
  29. Siekiera, J. (2020). European Science Diplomacy and its Applications to Global Challenges. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 49(3), 203–206. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.marszalek.com.pl/component/tags/tag/summer-school. · DOI
  30. Smith Jervelund, S., & Eikemo, T. A. (2021). The double burden of COVID-19. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 49, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494820984702. · DOI
  31. Tallberg, J., Lundgren, M., & Sommerer, T. (2020). Why International Organizations Commit to Liberal Norms. International Studies Quarterly, 64, 626–640. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa046. · DOI
  32. Task Force “EEAS 2.0.” (2021). From self-doubt to self-assurance: The European External Action Service as the indispensable support for a geopolitical EU. (P. Vilmont, C. Hillion, & S. Blockmans, Eds.). Brussels: CEPS, SIEPS, FES. Retrieved from https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/from-self-doubt-to-self-assurance/.
  33. Tocci, 2018, Academia and practice in European foreign policy: Opportunities for mutual learning, Journal of European Integration, 40, 837, 10.1080/07036337.2018.1524466 · DOI
  34. Wall, 2006, An Autoethnography on Learning About Autoethnography, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 146, 10.1177/160940690600500205 · DOI
  35. Wall, 2008, Easier Said than Done: Writing an Autoethnography, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7, 38, 10.1177/160940690800700103 · DOI
  36. Wang, 2020, From Globalization to Regionalization: The United States, China, and the Post-Covid-19 World Economic Order, Journal of Chinese Political Science, 26, 69, 10.1007/s11366-020-09706-3 · DOI
  37. Warren, 2021, COVID-19: The winter lockdown strategy in five European nations, Journal of Risk Research, 24, 267, 10.1080/13669877.2021.1891802 · DOI
  38. Yelland, R. (2011). The Globalisation of Higher Education. OECD Observer, 287(Q4). Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-observer_15615529.

Metadata

Authors
Šime, Z.
Affiliations
United Nations University Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies (BE)
Corresponding author
Šime, Zane
ORCID
Šime, Zane
Venue
Research in Globalization
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
3
Pages
100057
ISSN
2590-051X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100057
OpenAlex
W3185039991
Cited by
1
References
60
Citations by year
2023: 1
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Research in Globalization (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Horizon 2020
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Science and Diplomacy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Central Asia Education and Culture
Keywords
EU-India relations, science diplomacy, Asia-Europe Meeting, people-to-people connectivity, COVID-19 restrictions, higher education, extracurricular activities, capacity building, virtual events

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EU-India relations in the multi-vector matrix of science diplomacy and Asia-Europe Meeting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100057
The paper
Šime, Z. (2021). EU-India relations in the multi-vector matrix of science diplomacy and Asia-Europe Meeting. Research in Globalization. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100057