The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The European standard on planetary protection requirements
Open accessAbstract
Since the beginning of solar system exploration, numerous spacecrafts have been sent towards others worlds, and one of the main goals of such missions is the search for extraterrestrial forms of life. It is known that, under certain conditions, some terrestrial entities are able to survive during cruises in space and that they may contaminate other planets (forward contamination). At another level, possible extraterrestrial life forms are unknown and their ability to contaminate the Earth's biosphere (back contamination) in the frame of sample return missions cannot be excluded. Article IX of the Outer Space Treaty (London/Washington, January 27, 1967) requires the preservation of planets and the Earth from contamination. All nations taking part in this Treaty must prevent forward and back contamination during missions exploring our solar system. Consequently, the United Nations (UN-COPUOS) has delegated COSPAR (Committee of Space Research) to take charge of planetary protection and, at present, all space-faring nations must comply with COSPAR policy and consequently with COSPAR planetary protection recommendations. Starting from these recommendations and the "CNES Planetary Protection Standard" document, a working group has been set up in the framework of the "European Cooperation for Space Standardization" (ECSS) to establish the main specifications for preventing cross-contamination between target bodies within the solar system and the Earth-moon system.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Space agencies around the world are requested to follow the COSPAR guidelines, which have a major impact on their mission design, spacecraft hardware, and payload.
“Space agencies around the world are requested to follow the COSPAR guidelines, which have a major impact on their mission design, spacecraft hardware, and payload (Debus, 2006).”
From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Debus, 2006
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- COSPAR, Planetary Protection Policy, 20 October 2002 · DOI
- Debus, 2002, Landers sterile integration: Example of Mars 96 mission, Acta Astronaut., 50, 385, 10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00160-6 · DOI
- A. Debus, T. Auburtin, J.C. Darbord, Hydrogen Peroxide Gas Plasma Sterilization Process Qualification for Space Application, in: SAE Publication ICES-128, 2000 · DOI
- Debus, 2001, Planetary protection aspects for in situ and sample return exobiological experimentations, Int. J. Astrobiol., 1, 185
- Debus, 2002, Planetary protection requirements for orbiter and netlander of the CNES/NASA Mars sample return mission, Adv. Space Res., 30, 1607, 10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00482-9 · DOI
- A. Debus, Planetary Protection: Organization, Requirements and Needs for Future Planetary Exploration Missions, in: ESA Conference Publication SP-543, 2004, pp. 103–114
- Debus, 2004, COSPAR need for planetary protection recommendations for sample preservation dedicated to exobiology, Adv. Space Res., 34, 2320, 10.1016/j.asr.2004.01.015 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Adamala, K., Arina de la Rubia, L., Bond, J., Dartnell, L. R., Goldman, A. D., Lynch, K., et al. (2016) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2015.1460 · Cited by 136
“Space agencies around the world are requested to follow the COSPAR guidelines, which have a major impact on their mission design, spacecraft hardware, and payload (Debus, 2006).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Debus, A.
- Venue
- Research in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-18
- ISSN
- 0769-2609 (ISSN-L)
- 0923-2508
- OpenAlex
- W2052818529
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 6534 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Research in Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Space exploration and regulation
- Keywords
- planetary protection, forward contamination, back contamination, Outer Space Treaty, search for extraterrestrial life, sample return missions
- MeSH terms
- Environmental Microbiology, Environmental Pollution, Europe, Extraterrestrial Environment, Space Flight, Earth, Planet, Exobiology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review