Adhesion of bile-adapted Bifidobacterium strains to the HT29-MTX cell line is modified after sequential gastrointestinal challenge simulated in vitro using human gastric and duodenal juices
Open accessAbstract
According to the FAO/WHO, in vitro criteria for selection of probiotics for food application consist of testing survival when confronted with gastrointestinal tract (GIT) challenge and the ability to colonize the colon. We used a model that simulated GIT transit using sequential immersion in gastric and duodenal juices of human origin to evaluate survival of bile-adapted Bifidobacterium strains. Bifidobacterium animalis tolerated gastric juice, whereas Bifidobacterium longum showed poor survival under these conditions. In contrast, B. animalis strains were more sensitive to duodenal juice than B. longum. The percentage of survival after GIT transit simulation (GITTS), determined both by plate counts and fluorescent probes, was significantly higher for bile-adapted strains than for corresponding parental ones. This suggests that use of bile-adapted strains is a suitable approach for increasing survival of bifidobacteria under the harsh conditions of the upper GIT. However, the bile resistance phenotype was not related to improvement of adhesion capacity, after GITTS, of the intestinal cell line HT29-MTX which constitutively produces mucus. This work shows that sequential GITTS with human juices modified the in vitro adhesion properties of the strains challenged with colonocyte-like cells.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The preparation of bifidobacterial suspensions in skimmed milk increased significantly their viability under simulated gastrointestinal transit with human stomach and duodenal fluids.
“The preparation of bifidobacterial suspensions in skimmed milk increased significantly their viability under simulated gastrointestinal transit with human stomach and duodenal fluids (98).”
From Bifidobacteria and Their Health-Promoting Effects (2017) · cites this paper as [98]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- de los Reyes-Gavilán, C. G., Suárez, A., Fernández-García, M., Margolles, A., Gueimonde, M., & Ruas-Madiedo, P.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Universitario De Cabueñes (ES)
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Venue
- Research in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 514-519
- ISSN
- 0769-2609 (ISSN-L)
- 0923-2508
- OpenAlex
- W1965811531
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 7.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Research in Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
- Keywords
- Bifidobacterium, probiotic viability, gastric juice, duodenal juice, bacterial adhesion, HT29-MTX cells, Bifidobacterium animalis, Bifidobacterium longum, mucous cells, probiotic selection criteria
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Bacterial Adhesion, Bifidobacterium, Bile, Body Fluids, Duodenum, Female, Gastric Juice, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, HT29 Cells, Gastrointestinal Tract, Microbial Viability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review