Cortical and subcortical central neural pathways in respiratory sensations
Abstract
Respiratory sensations motivate humans to behaviorally modulate their breathing and are the sensory urge component of the respiratory motivation-to-action neural system. Human and animal studies have provided evidence for the neural substrate for afferents in the respiratory tract and muscles to project to the cerebral cortex. Respiratory afferents continually transduce breathing pattern into a sensory neural code. This neural code is transmitted to a subcortical gating area. Respiratory sensory information is then transmitted by respiratory modality specific convergent and divergent subcortical pathways to the cerebral cortex. There are two primary cortical pathways: (1) the discriminative pathway related to respiratory proprioception and (2) the affective pathway related to the qualitative assessment of breathing. Respiratory sensory information is processed by the discriminatory somatosensory-motor cortex and the affective mesocortex resulting in conscious awareness of breathing that can lead to distressing respiratory sensations. The significance of respiratory sensory information processing is the fundamental interoceptive perception of ventilatory status.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Controlled, rhythmic breathing provides a stream of sensory information that has an affective component.
“Controlled, rhythmic breathing provides a stream of sensory information that has an affective component (Davenport and Vovk, 2009; Haase et al., 2016).”
From Mindfulness, Interoception, and the Body: A Contemporary Perspective (2019) · cites this paper as Davenport and Vovk, 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 136 · Cited by 235
- Authors
- Davenport, P. W., & Vovk, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Davenport, Paul W.
- ORCID
- Davenport, Paul W.
- Venue
- Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 72-86
- ISSN
- 1569-9048 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093072466
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 136
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
- Keywords
- respiratory sensation, affective pathways, interoception, respiratory distress
- MeSH terms
- Afferent Pathways, Animals, Brain, Humans, Respiration, Respiratory System, Sensation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review