Cited by 235Neuroscience of respiration and sleepPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsRespiratory and Cough-Related Research

Cortical and subcortical central neural pathways in respiratory sensations

Davenport, Paul W., Vovk, Andrea·2009·Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology

Abstract

Respiratory sensations motivate humans to behaviorally modulate their breathing and are the sensory urge component of the respiratory motivation-to-action neural system. Human and animal studies have provided evidence for the neural substrate for afferents in the respiratory tract and muscles to project to the cerebral cortex. Respiratory afferents continually transduce breathing pattern into a sensory neural code. This neural code is transmitted to a subcortical gating area. Respiratory sensory information is then transmitted by respiratory modality specific convergent and divergent subcortical pathways to the cerebral cortex. There are two primary cortical pathways: (1) the discriminative pathway related to respiratory proprioception and (2) the affective pathway related to the qualitative assessment of breathing. Respiratory sensory information is processed by the discriminatory somatosensory-motor cortex and the affective mesocortex resulting in conscious awareness of breathing that can lead to distressing respiratory sensations. The significance of respiratory sensory information processing is the fundamental interoceptive perception of ventilatory status.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resp.2008.10.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Controlled, rhythmic breathing provides a stream of sensory information that has an affective component.

    “Controlled, rhythmic breathing provides a stream of sensory information that has an affective component (Davenport and Vovk, 2009; Haase et al., 2016).”

    From Mindfulness, Interoception, and the Body: A Contemporary Perspective (2019) · cites this paper as Davenport and Vovk, 2009

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 136 · Cited by 235

Authors
Davenport, P. W., & Vovk, A.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Davenport, Paul W.
Venue
Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
167
Issue
1
Pages
72-86
ISSN
1569-9048 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093072466
Cited by
235
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
Keywords
respiratory sensation, affective pathways, interoception, respiratory distress
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Animals, Brain, Humans, Respiration, Respiratory System, Sensation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review