CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 520Research, Science, and AcademiaDoctoral Education Challenges and SolutionsHigher Education and Employability

A taste for science? PhD scientists’ academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry

Open access
Roach, Michael, Sauermann, Henry·2010·Research Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 61 · Cited by 520

Authors
Roach, M., & Sauermann, H.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Sauermann, Henry
ORCID
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
422-434
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.004
OpenAlex
W2014293532
Cited by
520
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 24
FWCI
40.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Research Policy (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
Keywords
doctoral students, career choice, academic orientation, scientific careers, innovation policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review