The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: A patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942 · cited 4×
“Since March’s seminal work on the relationship between exploitation of old certainties and exploration of new possibilities in organization learning (March, 1991), many scholars have investigated exploitative and exploratory innovations (Gilsing and Nooteboom, 2006; Lavie et al., 2010;…”
BackgroundInfluentialSocial Capital: Prospects for a New Concept
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134367 · Cited by 9,665 · cited 2×
“These relationships serve as social capital and represent the flowing and searching channels of knowledge and information (Adler and Kwon, 2002; GonzalezBrambila et al., 2013; Moran, 2005).”
BackgroundHsiao, C. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139839327 · Cited by 7,869
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375 · Cited by 5,649
Structural Holes and Good Ideas
Burt, R. S. (2004) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/421787 · Cited by 5,642
Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490248 · Cited by 3,967
Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem
Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/432782 · Cited by 1,885 · cited 1×
“These debates mainly focus on the structural and relational characteristics of social networks and have been conducted across multiple research fields and multiple levels of analysis (Gonzalez-Brambila et al., 2013; Karamanos, 2012; Phelps et al., 2012; Uzzi and Spiro, 2005).”
BackgroundPatents and Innovation: An Empirical Study
Mansfield, E. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.2.173 · Cited by 1,128
Cited by
Of leaders and laggards - Towards digitalization of the process industries
Aaldering, L. J., & Song, C. H. (2021) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102211 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Guan, J., & Liu, N.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-112
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2173797018
- Cited by
- 734
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 50.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: A patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.respol.2015.08.002
- The paper
- Guan, J., & Liu, N. (2016). Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: A patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.08.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
