The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green patents, regulatory policies and research network policies
Open accessAbstract
The main goal of this paper is to analyse the single and joint impact of regulation policies and research network policies on environmental innovation. Our theoretical framework combines the open eco-innovation mode approach with the Porter Hypothesis, by adapting them to the knowledge production function where green patents are the dependent variable. We focus on the factors that influence the production of green patents as a proxy of new “environmental” knowledge for a panel of European countries over time. We find that both marked-based regulation policies and participation in green European research networks (in particular with universities and public research centres) positively affect environmental innovation. Moreover, the two policy tools have a complementary effect. This suggests that the effectiveness of environmental regulation policies can be increased by combining them with appropriate innovation policies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Schwartz, E. S., Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2329279 · Cited by 9,498
(2003) · Cited by 9,368
Dixit, R. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994) · doi:10.1515/9781400830176 · Cited by 9,029
Regression Analysis of Count Data
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139013567 · Cited by 6,640
The Oxford Handbook of Innovation
(2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001 · Cited by 5,922
Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey
Griliches, Z. (1990) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3301 · Cited by 5,828
Understanding Institutional Diversity
Ostrom, E. (2006) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400831739 · Cited by 5,140
Interaction terms in logit and probit models
Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. (2003) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/s0165-1765(03)00032-6 · Cited by 4,599
Understanding Institutional Diversity
Ostrom, E. (2009) · doi:10.2307/j.ctt7s7wm · Cited by 4,229
Cited by
Xing, C., Zhang, Y., & Tripe, D. (2021) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101838 · Cited by 417
Ferreira, J. J. M., Fernandes, C. I., & Ferreira, F. A. F. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119770 · Cited by 300
Does Green Public Procurement Trigger Environmental Innovations?
Krieger, B., & Zipperer, V. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3927260 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Fabrizi, A., Guarini, G., & Meliciani, V.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1018-1031
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2792569820
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 108
- FWCI
- 33.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green patents, regulatory policies and research network policies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.005
- The paper
- Fabrizi, A., Guarini, G., & Meliciani, V. (2018). Green patents, regulatory policies and research network policies. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
