The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., & Chan, K. P.-S. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485594 · Cited by 2,275
Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices
Saltelli, A. (2002) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(02)00280-1 · Cited by 2,228
Cited by
Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis
Teng, J., Jakeman, A. J., Vaze, J., Croke, B. F. W., Dutta, D., & Kim, S. (2017) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006 · Cited by 1,456
Blatman, G., & Sudret, B. (2010) · Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2009.10.003 · Cited by 832
Self-citationRandom forests for global sensitivity analysis: A selective review
Antoniadis, A., Lambert-Lacroix, S., & Poggi, J.-M. (2021) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2020.107312 · Cited by 363
Laloy, E., Rogiers, B., Vrugt, J. A., Mallants, D., & Jacques, D. (2013) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/wrcr.20226 · Cited by 264
Variance-based sensitivity indices for models with dependent inputs
Mara, T. A., & Tarantola, S. (2012) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2011.08.008 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Sudret, B.
- Venue
- Reliability Engineering & System Safety
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 964-979
- ISSN
- 0951-8320 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049774453
- Cited by
- 2,539
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.002
- The paper
- Sudret, B. (2008). Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
