The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Critical infrastructures at risk: A need for a new conceptual approach and extended analytical tools
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures
Zio, E. (2016) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2016.02.009 · Cited by 429
Review of security issues in industrial networks
Cheminod, M., Durante, L., & Valenzano, A. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2012.2198666 · Cited by 349
The Security of Big Data in Fog-Enabled IoT Applications Including Blockchain: A Survey
Tariq, N., Asim, M., Al-Obeidat, F., Zubair Farooqi, M., Baker, T., Hammoudeh, M., & Ghafir, I. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19081788 · Cited by 268
Impacts of climate change on European critical infrastructures: The case of the power sector
Rübbelke, D., & Vögele, S. (2011) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.10.007 · Cited by 164
Cybersecurity Hazards and Financial System Vulnerability: A Synthesis of Literature
Uddin, M. H., Ali, M. H., & Hassan, M. K. (2020) · Risk Management · doi:10.1057/s41283-020-00063-2 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Kröger, W.
- Venue
- Reliability Engineering & System Safety
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1781-1787
- ISSN
- 0951-8320 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017120539
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical infrastructures at risk: A need for a new conceptual approach and extended analytical tools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ress.2008.03.005
- The paper
- Kröger, W. (2008). Critical infrastructures at risk: A need for a new conceptual approach and extended analytical tools. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.03.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
