Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 523

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Remaining useful life predictions for turbofan engine degradation using semi-supervised deep architecture

Open access
Listou Ellefsen, André, Bjørlykhaug, Emil, Æsøy, Vilmar, Ushakov, Sergey, Zhang, Houxiang·2019·Reliability Engineering & System Safety

Abstract

In recent years, research has proposed several deep learning (DL) approaches to providing reliable remaining useful life (RUL) predictions in Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) applications. Although supervised DL techniques, such as Convolutional Neural Network and Long-Short Term Memory, have outperformed traditional prognosis algorithms, they are still dependent on large labeled training datasets. With respect to real-life PHM applications, high-quality labeled training data might be both challenging and time-consuming to acquire. Alternatively, unsupervised DL techniques introduce an initial pre-training stage to extract degradation related features from raw unlabeled training data automatically. Thus, the combination of unsupervised and supervised (semi-supervised) learning has the potential to provide high RUL prediction accuracy even with reduced amounts of labeled training data. This paper investigates the effect of unsupervised pre-training in RUL predictions utilizing a semi-supervised setup. Additionally, a Genetic Algorithm (GA) approach is applied in order to tune the diverse amount of hyper-parameters in the training procedure. The advantages of the proposed semi-supervised setup have been verified on the popular C-MAPSS dataset. The experimental study, compares this approach to purely supervised training, both when the training data is completely labeled and when the labeled training data is reduced, and to the most robust results in the literature. The results suggest that unsupervised pre-training is a promising feature in RUL predictions subjected to multiple operating conditions and fault modes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.027

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 523

Metadata

Authors
Listou Ellefsen, A., Bjørlykhaug, E., Æsøy, V., Ushakov, S., & Zhang, H.
Venue
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
183
Pages
240-251
ISSN
0951-8320 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2902700103
Cited by
523
References
43
FWCI
27.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remaining useful life predictions for turbofan engine degradation using semi-supervised deep architecture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.027
The paper
Listou Ellefsen, A., Bjørlykhaug, E., Æsøy, V., Ushakov, S., & Zhang, H. (2019). Remaining useful life predictions for turbofan engine degradation using semi-supervised deep architecture. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.027

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.