CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 64Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability AnalysisPower System Reliability and MaintenanceOptimal Power Flow Distribution

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Power outage prediction for natural hazards using synthetic power distribution systems

Zhai, Chengwei, Chen, Thomas Ying-jeh, White, Anna Grace, Guikema, Seth David·2021·Reliability Engineering & System Safety
DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107348
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107348

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 2017, 9 of the worst power outages in United States history, Electric Choice
  2. Guikema, 2014, Predicting hurricane power outages to support storm response planning, IEEE Access, 2, 1364, 10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2365716 · DOI
  3. Shafieezadeh, 2014, Age-dependent fragility models of utility wood poles in power distribution networks against extreme wind hazards, IEEE Trans Power Deliv, 29, 131, 10.1109/TPWRD.2013.2281265 · DOI
  4. Salman, 2015, Evaluating system reliability and targeted hardening strategies of power distribution systems subjected to hurricanes, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 144, 319, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.028 · DOI
  5. Davidson, 2003, Electric power distribution system performance in Carolina hurricanes, Nat Hazards Rev, 4, 36, 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:1(36) · DOI
  6. Abdul Rahman, 2013, Application of fault tree analysis for customer reliability assessment of a distribution power system, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 111, 76, 10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.011 · DOI
  7. Davidson, 2003, Electric power distribution system performance in Carolina hurricanes, Nat Hazards Rev, 4, 36, 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:1(36) · DOI
  8. Han, 2009, Improving the predictive accuracy of hurricane power outage forecasts using generalized additive models, Risk Anal, 29, 1443, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01280.x · DOI
  9. Han, 2009, Estimating the spatial distribution of power outages during hurricanes in the Gulf coast region, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 94, 199, 10.1016/j.ress.2008.02.018 · DOI
  10. Guikema, 2010, Prestorm estimation of hurricane damage to electric power distribution systems, Risk Anal, 30, 1744, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01510.x · DOI
  11. Nateghi, 2014, Power outage estimation for tropical cyclones: improved accuracy with simpler models, Risk Anal., 34, 1069, 10.1111/risa.12131 · DOI
  12. McRoberts, 2018, Improving hurricane power outage prediction models through the inclusion of local environmental factors, Risk Anal., 38, 2722, 10.1111/risa.12728 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Shashaani, 2018, Multi-stage prediction for zero-inflated hurricane induced power outages, IEEE Access, 6, 62432, 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2877078 · DOI
  14. Kabir, 2019, Predicting thunderstorm-induced power outages to support utility restoration, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 34, 4370, 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2914214 · DOI
  15. Han, 2009, Estimating the spatial distribution of power outages during hurricanes in the Gulf coast region, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 94, 199, 10.1016/j.ress.2008.02.018 · DOI
  16. He, 2017, Nonparametric tree-based predictive modeling of storm outages on an electric distribution network, Risk Anal, 37, 441, 10.1111/risa.12652 · DOI
  17. Guikema, 2009, Natural disaster risk analysis for critical infrastructure systems: an approach based on statistical learning theory, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 94, 855, 10.1016/j.ress.2008.09.003 · DOI
  18. Guikema, 2012, Hybrid data mining-regression for infrastructure risk assessment based on zero-inflated data, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 99, 178, 10.1016/j.ress.2011.10.012 · DOI
  19. Cerrai, 2019, Predicting storm outages through new representations of weather and vegetation, IEEE Access, 7, 29639, 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2902558 · DOI
  20. D'Amico, 2019, Improving the hurricane outage prediction model by including tree species, Clim Risk Manag, 25
  21. Staid, 2014, Simulation of tropical cyclone impacts to the U.S. power system under climate change scenarios, Clim Change, 127, 535, 10.1007/s10584-014-1272-3 · DOI
  22. Vickery, 2006, HAZUS-MH hurricane model methodology. II: damage and loss estimation, Nat Hazards Rev, 7, 94, 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(94) · DOI
  23. Kircher, 2006, HAZUS earthquake loss estimation methods, Nat Hazards Rev, 7, 45, 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(45) · DOI
  24. Vanzi, 1996, Seismic reliability of electric power networks: methodology and application, Struct Saf, 18, 311, 10.1016/S0167-4730(96)00024-0 · DOI
  25. Han, 2014, Integrating models and data to estimate the structural reliability of utility poles during hurricanes, Risk Anal, 34, 1079, 10.1111/risa.12102 · DOI
  26. Mohammadi Darestani, 2019, Multi-dimensional wind fragility functions for wood utility poles, Eng Struct., 183, 937, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.048 · DOI
  27. Guikema, 2006, Statistical models of the effects of tree trimming on power system outages, IEEE Trans Power Deliv, 21, 1549, 10.1109/TPWRD.2005.860238 · DOI
  28. S. Larocca, J. Johansson, H. Hassel, and S. Guikema, “Topological performance measures as surrogates for physical flow models for risk and vulnerability analysis for electric power systems,” 2013. · DOI
  29. Birchfield, 2017, Statistical considerations in the creation of realistic synthetic power grids for geomagnetic disturbance studies, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 32, 1502
  30. Pahwa, 2014, Abruptness of cascade failures in power grids, Sci Rep, 4, 10.1038/srep03694 · DOI
  31. Schultz, 2014, A random growth model for power grids and other spatially embedded infrastructure networks, Eur Phys J Spec Top, 223, 2593, 10.1140/epjst/e2014-02279-6 · DOI
  32. Pisano, 2019, Synthetic models of distribution networks based on open data and georeferenced information, Energies, 12, 4500, 10.3390/en12234500 · DOI
  33. Schweitzer, 2017, Automated generation algorithm for synthetic medium voltage radial distribution systems, IEEE J Emerg Sel Top Circ Syst, 7
  34. Miranda, 1994, Genetic algorithms in optimal multistage distribution network planning, IEEE Trans Power Syst, 9, 1927, 10.1109/59.331452 · DOI
  35. Valenzuela, 2019, Planning of a resilient underground distribution network using georeferenced data, Energies, 12, 644, 10.3390/en12040644 · DOI
  36. Yuan, 2016, Robust optimization-based resilient distribution network planning against natural disasters, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, 7, 2817, 10.1109/TSG.2015.2513048 · DOI
  37. Garey, 1977, The rectilinear Steiner tree problem is $NP$-complete, SIAM J Appl Math, 32, 826, 10.1137/0132071 · DOI
  38. Holland, 2010, A revised model for radial profiles of hurricane winds, Mon Weather Rev, 138, 4393, 10.1175/2010MWR3317.1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhai, C., Chen, T. Y.-J., White, A. G., & Guikema, S. D.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Zhai, Chengwei
ORCID
Venue
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
208
Pages
107348
ISSN
0951-8320 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2020.107348
OpenAlex
W3108081744
Cited by
64
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Reliability Engineering & System Safety (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
One Concern, Inc.
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Power System Reliability and Maintenance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
Keywords
power outage prediction, natural hazards, fragility curves, power system reliability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review