Cited by 36Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Is enteral feeding tolerated during therapeutic hypothermia?

Williams, Marie-Louise, Nolan, Jerry P.·2014·Resuscitation

Abstract

Objective To determine whether patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia following cardiac arrest tolerate early enteral nutrition. Methods We undertook a single-centre longitudinal cohort analysis of the tolerance of enteral feeding by 55 patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia following resuscitation from cardiac arrest. The observation period was divided into three phases: (1) 24h at target temperature (32-34 °C); (2) 24h rewarming to 36.5 °C; and (3) 24h maintained at a core temperature below 37.5 °C. Results During period 1, patients tolerated a median of 72% (interquartile range (IQR) 68.7%; range 31.3-100%) of administered feed. During period 2 (rewarming phase), a median of 95% (IQR 66.2%; range 33.77-100%) of administered feed was tolerated. During period 3 (normothermia) a median of 100% (IQR 4.75%; range 95.25-100%) of administered feed was tolerated. The highest incidence of vomiting or regurgitation of feed (19% of patients) occurred between 24 and 48 h of therapy. Conclusions Patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia following cardiac arrest may be able to tolerate a substantial proportion of their daily nutritional requirements. It is possible that routine use of prokinetic drugs during this period may increase the success of feed delivery enterally and this could usefully be explored.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.08.018

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Newer data demonstrated no difference in complications with early enteral nutrition (<48 hours) even during targeted temperature management.

    “newer data demonstrated no difference in complications with early EN (<48 hours) even during targeted temperature management.19,174–177”

    From Malnutrition and Cachexia in Inpatients With Acute Cardiac Conditions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2026) · cites this paper as [177]

    The Results (lines 18–30) show that patients received and tolerated some enteral feeding during the first 48 hours of therapeutic hypothermia. But the Strengths and limitations section (lines 207–215) describes a retrospective, descriptive study with no control of feeding practices; it cannot establish that complication rates were no different from a comparator. The Results also report vomiting or regurgitation in 19% of patients during hours 24–48. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 19 · Cited by 36

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [2]Scurlock C. Mechanick J. Early nutrition support in the intensive care unit: a 254 US perspective. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care 255 2008; 11: 152-155. 256
  2. [3]Elpern E. Stutz L. Peterson S. Gurka D. Skipper A. Outcomes Associated with 257 Enteral Tube Feedings in a Medical Intensive Care Unit. American Journal of 258 Critical Care 2004; 13: 221-227. 259
  3. [4]Kreymann K. Berger M. Deutz N. Hiesmayr M. Jolliet P. Kazandjiev G. 260 Nitenberg G. van der Berghe Wernerman D. Ebner C. Harti W. Heymann C. 261 Spies C. ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Intensive Care. Clinical 262 Nutrition 2006; 25: 210-223. 263
  4. [5]Roberts I. Research in Emergency Situations: with or without relatives 264 consent. Emergency Medicine Journal 2004; 21: 703. 265
  5. [7]Trudvang S. Holte H. Intensive Care Nursing: Therapeutic Hypothermia after 268 Cardiac Arrest. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 2010; 9: 1474-269 1480. 270
  6. [8]Polderman K. Application of Therapeutic Hypothermia in the Intensive Care 271 Unit. Intensive Care Medicine 2004; 30:757-769. 272
  7. [9]Polderman K. Mechanisms of action, physiological effects, and complications 273 of hypothermia. Critical Care Medicine 2009; 37: 186-202. 274
  8. [11]Korth U. Krieter H. Denz C. Janke C. Ellinger K. Bertsch T. Henn C. Klein J. 279 Intestinal ischaemia during cardiac arrest and resuscitation: comparative 280 analysis of extracellular metabolites by microdialysis. Resuscitation 2003; 58: 281 209-217. 282
  9. [12]Cerchiari E. Paradis N. Halperin H. Kern K. Wenzel V. Chamberlain D. Post 283 Resuscitation Syndrome in Cardiac Arrest. The Science and Practice of 284 Resuscitation Medicine (2nd Ed). Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 285 2007: 817. 286
  10. [13]Bader M. Clinical Q & A: Translating Therapeutic Temperature Management 287 from Theory to Practice. Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature 288 Management 2011; 1: 61-62. 289
  11. [14]Luscombe M. Andrzejowski J. Clinical Applications of Induced Hypothermia. 290 Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain 2006; 6: 23-27. 291
  12. [15]Cadell K. Martindale R. McClave S. Miller K. Can the Intestinal Dysmotility of 292 Critical Illness be differentiated from postoperative Ileus? Current 293 Gastroenterology Reports 2011; 13:358-367. 294
  13. [16]Taylor S. Treating Delayed Gastric Emptying in Critical Illness: 295 metaclopromide, erythromycin, and bedside (Cortrack) nasointestinal tube 296 placement. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 2011: 32: 289-294. 297
  14. [18]Knaus W A. Draper E A. Wagner D P. Zimmerman J E. APACHE II: a severity 300 of disease classification system. Critical Care Medicine 1985; 13: 818-829. 301
  15. [19]Ukleja A. Sanchez-Fermin P. Gastric versus Post-pyloric Feeding: 302 Relationship to Tolerance, Pneumonia Risk, and Successful Delivery of 303 Enteral Nutrition. Current Gastroenterology Reports 2007; 9: 309-316. 304

Authors
Williams, M.-L., & Nolan, J. P.
Affiliations
Royal United Hospital (GB)
Venue
Resuscitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
85
Issue
11
Pages
1469-1472
ISSN
0300-9572 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006397509
Cited by
36
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Resuscitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
therapeutic hypothermia, enteral nutrition, cardiac arrest, post-resuscitation care, feed tolerance, rewarming, prokinetic drugs, nutritional support
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Critical Care, Enteral Nutrition, Female, Follow-Up Studies, United Kingdom, Heart Arrest, Hospitals, General, Humans, Hypothermia, Induced, Intensive Care Units, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review