Cited by 44Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationCardiac Health and Mental Health

Early neurologically focused follow-up after cardiac arrest is cost-effective: a trial-based economic evaluation

Open access
Moulaert, Véronique R.M., Goossens, Mariëlle, Heijnders, Irene L.C., Verbunt, Jeanine A., Heugten, Caroline M. van·2016·Resuscitation

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an early intervention service for cardiac arrest survivors called 'Stand still …, and move on' from a societal perspective.Intervention This concise nursing intervention consists of screening for cognitive and emotional problems, information provision and support, self-management promotion, and further referral if necessary. Earlier research confirmed the feasibility of the intervention and its effectiveness in improving emotional functioning and quality of life.Methods In this multicentre randomized controlled trial with one year follow-up 185 patients were included between April 2007 and December 2010. The experimental group received the intervention, the control group received care-as-usual. Intervention costs, other direct healthcare costs (e.g. hospital care, rehabilitation, medication, home care) and indirect costs (productivity loss) were measured during ten months using monthly cost-diaries. The economic evaluation comprised a cost-utility analysis (SF-36) and a cost-effectiveness analysis (QOLIBRI) using bootstrapping (5000 replications) to quantify uncertainty concerning the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER), and the probability of the intervention being cost-effective was estimated. To check the robustness of the findings, two sensitivity analyses were performed using the EQ-5D and the complete cases respectively.Results Of 136 (74%) participants sufficient data concerning costs were collected to be included in this economic evaluation. Intervention costs were on average €127 (SD 85). No significant differences between groups were found with regard to overall costs. The ICERs of the cost-utility and the cost-effectiveness analyses supported the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. The probability of the intervention being cost-effective was 54-76% for the SF-36 and 94% for the QOLIBRI. Findings were robust.Conclusion The intervention 'Stand still …, and move on' has positive societal economic effects and has a high probability to be cost-effective. Implementation in regular healthcare is recommended.Trial registration ISRCTN74835019.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.06.015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observational data suggest that females and individuals from socially deprived and ethnic minority groups are less likely to receive bystander CPR and key post-arrest interventions.

    “Observational data suggest that females and individuals from socially deprived and ethnic minority groups are less likely to receive bystander CPR and key post-arrest interventions. 295,296”

    From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [296]

    Table 1 (page unavailable) records bystander CPR and participants’ sex, but compares trial arms rather than CPR receipt by sex, deprivation, or ethnicity. The Participants section (page unavailable) notes that women were more likely to drop out of this follow-up study; it does not address access to bystander CPR or post-arrest interventions. Searches for social deprivation, ethnic minority status, and disparities in CPR or intervention receipt found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 44

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [21]21. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997;35:1095-108.
  2. [24]24. Lamers LM, Stalmeier PFM, McDonnell J, Krabbe PFM, van Busschbach JJ. Kwaliteit van leven meten in econonische evaluaties: Het nederlands eq-5d- tarief. Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 2005;149:1574-8.
  3. [25]25. Briggs AH, Wonderling DE, Mooney CZ. Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation. Health Econ 1997;6:327-40.

Authors
Moulaert, V. R. M., Goossens, M., Heijnders, I. L. C., Verbunt, J. A., & Heugten, C. M. V.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • De Hoogstraat Revalidatie (NL)
Corresponding author
Moulaert, Véronique R.M.
Venue
Resuscitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
106
Pages
30-36
ISSN
0300-9572 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2469006914
Cited by
44
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Resuscitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
ZonMw (ZonMw 920-03-373, 920-03-373)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
cardiac arrest survivors, cost-effectiveness, nursing interventions, quality of life, productivity loss, health care costs
MeSH terms
Aged, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Arrest, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Care Costs, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review