Cited by 54Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesCardiac Health and Mental Health

Detailed analysis of health-related quality of life after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Bohm, Mattias, Lilja, Gisela, Finnbogadóttir, Hafrún, Cronberg, Tobias, Undén, Johan, Friberg, Hans, Kjærgaard, Jesper, Nielsen, Niklas +2 more·2019·Resuscitation

Abstract

Aim To describe the detailed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in survivors from the TTM-trial and to investigate potential differences related to sex and age. Methods This is a cross-sectional study originating from a large prospective international, multicentre trial, including 442 respondents who answered the Short Form-36 item Questionnaire Health Survey version 2 ® (SF-36v2 ® ) at a structured follow-up 6 months after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Statistical analysis between independent groups were performed with Mann-Whitney U or Chi-square. Age was analysed primarily as a dichotomised variable. Results Although overall physical and mental health were within the normal range, a substantial proportion of respondents had impaired function at domain-specific levels, particularly in Role-Physical (50%) and Role-Emotional (35%). Females scored significantly lower than males in; Physical Functioning (41.7 vs. 47.9, p 65 years scored significantly better in Vitality (50.8 vs. 53.7, p = 0.006) and Mental Health (50.3 vs. 52.6, p = 0.04). Conclusions Many OHCA survivors demonstrated impaired function in HRQoL at a domain level, despite most patients reporting an acceptable general HRQoL. Females reported worse HRQoL than males. Older age was associated with a worse Physical Functioning but better Vitality and Mental Health. Role-Physical and Role-Emotional aspects of health were especially affected, even when effects of age and sex where accounted for.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.028

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During the design phase of the pragmatic adrenaline trial, the main outcomes were specified in collaboration with patient and public representatives.

    “During the design phase of the pragmatic adrenaline trial, the main outcomes were specified in collaboration with patient and public representatives. 318”
  • Another concern pertains to the substantially disproportionate funding favouring commercial research evaluating the efficacy of highcost, patent protected drugs or devices over the undoubtedly necessary, non-commercial, academic resuscitation research on patent-unprotected, low-cost, widely used drugs of potentially uncertain efficacy, such as adrenaline (epinephrine), or antiarrhythmics.

    “Another concern pertains to the substantially disproportionate funding favouring commercial research evaluating the efficacy of highcost, patent protected drugs or devices over the undoubtedly necessary, non-commercial, academic resuscitation research on patent-unprotected, low-cost, widely used drugs of potentially uncertain efficacy, such as adrenaline (epinephrine), or antiarrhythmics. 63,318,”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bohm, M., Lilja, G., Finnbogadóttir, H., Cronberg, T., Undén, J., Friberg, H., Kjærgaard, J., Nielsen, N., Wise, M. P., & Åkerman, E.
Affiliations
  • Skåne University Hospital (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Malmö University (SE)
  • Rigshospitalet (DK)
  • University Hospital of Wales (GB)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Bohm, Mattias
Venue
Resuscitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
135
Pages
197-204
ISSN
0300-9572 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899135649
Cited by
54
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Resuscitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Union Interreg IVA programme
  • Swedish Heart and Lung Association
  • Skåne University Hospital Foundations
  • Gyllenstierna-Krapperup Foundation, Academy of Caring Sciences at Skåne University Hospital
  • Swedish National Health System (ALF)
  • County Council of Skåne, the Swedish Society of Medicine
  • Koch Foundation
  • Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, AFA Insurance Foundation
  • Hans-Gabriel and Alice Trolle-Wachtmeister Foundation for medical research, the Segerfalk Foundation and the Tryg Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, health-related quality of life, cardiac arrest survivors, sex differences, age differences, physical function, mental health, vitality, role physical, emotional role
MeSH terms
Emotional Adjustment, Physical Functional Performance, Activities of Daily Living, Age Factors, Aged, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Global Health, Survivors, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review