Cited by 60Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesCardiac Health and Mental Health

Sex differences in the quality-of-life and functional outcome of cardiac arrest survivors

Nehme, Ziad, Andrew, Emily, Bernard, Stephen, Smith, Karen·2019·Resuscitation

Abstract

Aim Although survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is improving, little is known about the long-term outcome of survivors. In this study, we assess the impact of sex on 12 month functional recovery and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes in OHCA survivors. Methods Between 2010 and 2016, consecutive adult OHCA survivors were invited to participate in structured telephone interviews using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE), the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) health survey. Results Of the 2300 patients discharged alive, 175 (7.6%) died during the follow-up period with the rate of death at 12 months being higher in women compared to men (10.4% vs. 6.4%; p = 0.002). Of the 2125 12 month survivors, 1752 (82.5%) participated in the interviews. Unadjusted outcomes were consistently poorer for females compared to males, with fewer women reporting good functional recovery (GOSE ≥ 7, 53.5% vs. 64.8%, p Conclusions Women report poorer functional recovery and HRQoL after OHCA. Further research is needed to better understand the reasons for these disparities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.01.034

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deferred consent may be necessary because the therapeutic window is too narrow to obtain a valid preenrolment consent.

    “Deferred consent (i.e. obtaining consent from a surrogate and/or patient as soon as possible after enrolment) may be necessary because the therapeutic window is too narrow to obtain a valid preenrolment consent. 63,317,322 324”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nehme, Z., Andrew, E., Bernard, S., & Smith, K.
Affiliations
  • Ambulance Victoria (AU)
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Nehme, Ziad
Venue
Resuscitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
137
Pages
21-28
ISSN
0300-9572 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2911743107
Cited by
60
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Resuscitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (1146809)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, sex differences, health-related quality of life, functional recovery, long-term outcomes, post-cardiac arrest syndrome, women, mortality, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, EQ-5D, SF-12, mental health, physical health, return to work
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Victoria, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Survivors, Recovery of Function, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review