The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness of a community based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) interventional bundle: Results of a pilot study
Abstract
Background 70% of Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) in Singapore occur in residential areas, and are associated with poorer outcomes. We hypothesized that an interventional bundle consisting of Save-A-life (SAL) initiative (cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)/automated external defibrillator (AED) training and public-housing AED installation), dispatcher-assisted CPR (DA-CPR) program and myResponder (mobile application) will improve OHCA survival. Methods This is pilot data from initial implementation of a stepped-wedge, before-after, real-world interventional bundle in six selected regions. Under the SAL initiative, 30,000 individuals were CPR/AED trained, with 360 AEDs installed. Data was obtained from Singapore's national OHCA Registry. We included all adult patients who experienced OHCA in Singapore from 2011 to 2016 within study regions, excluding EMS-witnessed cases and cases due to trauma/drowning/ electrocution. Cases occurring before and after intervention were allocated as control and intervention groups respectively. Survival was assessed via multivariable logistic regression. Results 1241 patients were included for analysis (Intervention: 361; Control: 880). The intervention group had higher mean age (70 vs 67 years), survival (3.3% [12/361] vs. 2.2% [19/880]), pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (9.1% [33/361] vs 5.1% [45/880]), bystander CPR (63.7% [230/361] vs 44.8% [394/880]) and bystander AED application (2.8% [10/361] vs 1.1% [10/880]). After adjusting for age, gender, race and significant covariates, the intervention was associated with increased odds ratio (OR) for survival (OR 2.39 [1.02-5.62]), pre-hospital ROSC (OR 1.94 [1.15-3.25]) and bystander CPR (OR 2.29 [1.77-2.96]). Conclusion The OHCA interventional bundle (SAL initiative, DA-CPR, myResponder) significantly improved survival and is being scaled up as a national program.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some authors identified fear of legal consequences as a potential barrier to bystander CPR.
“Some authors also identified fear of legal consequences as a potential barrier. 230,231”
From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [230]
Citations
Cites
The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting
Hemming, K., Haines, T. P., Chilton, P. J., Girling, A. J., & Lilford, R. J. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h391 · Cited by 1,410
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Chan, 2014, Recent trends in survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States, Circulation
- Larsen, 1993, Predicting survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a graphic model, Ann Emerg Med, 22, 1652, 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81302-2 · DOI
- Cummins, 1991, Improving survival from sudden cardiac arrest: the “chain of survival” concept, Circulation, 83, 1832, 10.1161/01.CIR.83.5.1832 · DOI
- Lai, 2015, Interventional strategies associated with improvements in survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Singapore over 10 years, Resuscitation, 89, 155, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.01.034 · DOI
- Goh, 2012, Effect of location of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on survival outcomes, Proc Singapore Healthc, 21, i-S365
- Hussey, 2007, Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials, Contemp Clin Trials, 28, 182, 10.1016/j.cct.2006.05.007 · DOI
- Ong, 2015, Outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests across 7 countries in Asia: The Pan Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS), Resuscitation, 96, 100, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.026 · DOI
- Rajan, 2016, Association of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival according to ambulance response times after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, Circulation, 134, 2095, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024400 · DOI
- Xue, 2013, Factors influencing outcomes after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in emergency department, World J Emerg Med, 4, 183, 10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2013.03.005 · DOI
- Stiell, 1999, Modifiable factors associated with improved cardiac arrest survival in a multicenter basic life support/defibrillation system: OPALS study phase I results. Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support, Ann Emerg Med, 33, 44, 10.1016/S0196-0644(99)70415-4 · DOI
- Bobrow, 2010, Chest compression — only CPR by lay rescuers and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, Jama, 304, 1447, 10.1001/jama.2010.1392 · DOI
- Bergamo, 2016, TAKE10: a community approach to teaching compression-only CPR to high-risk zip codes, Resuscitation, 102, 75, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.019 · DOI
- Uber, 2018, Does non-targeted community CPR training increase bystander CPR frequency?, Prehospital Emerg Care, 1
- Sasson, 2010, Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 3, 63, 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.889576 · DOI
- Folke, 2010, Differences between out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in residential and public locations and implications for public-access defibrillation, Circulation, 122, 623, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924423 · DOI
- Herlitz, 2002, Characteristics and outcome among patients having out of hospital cardiac arrest at home compared with elsewhere, Heart, 88, 579, 10.1136/heart.88.6.579 · DOI
- Iwami, 2006, Outcome and characteristics of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest according to location of arrest: a report from a large-scale, population-based study in Osaka, Japan, Resuscitation, 69, 221, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.08.018 · DOI
- Litwin, 1987, The location of collapse and its effect on survival from cardiac arrest, Ann Emerg Med, 16, 787, 10.1016/S0196-0644(87)80576-0 · DOI
- Swor, 2003, Cardiac arrest in private locations: different strategies are needed to improve outcome, Resuscitation, 58, 171, 10.1016/S0300-9572(03)00118-7 · DOI
- Hansen, 2017, bystander defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in public vs residential locations, JAMA Cardiol, 2, 507, 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0008 · DOI
- Investigators TPADT, 2004, Public-access defibrillation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, N Engl J Med, 351, 637, 10.1056/NEJMoa040566 · DOI
- Valenzuela, 2000, Outcomes of rapid defibrillation by security officers after cardiac arrest in casinos, N Engl J Med, 343, 1206, 10.1056/NEJM200010263431701 · DOI
- Page, 2000, Use of automated external defibrillators by a U.S. Airline, N Engl J Med, 343, 1210, 10.1056/NEJM200010263431702 · DOI
- Capucci, 2002, Tripling survival from sudden cardiac arrest via early defibrillation without traditional education in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Circulation, 106, 1065, 10.1161/01.CIR.0000028148.62305.69 · DOI
- Berdowski, 2011, Impact of onsite or dispatched automated external defibrillator use on survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, Circulation, 124, 2225, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.015545 · DOI
- Berdowski, 2010, Survival and health care costs until hospital discharge of patients treated with onsite, dispatched or without automated external defibrillator, Resuscitation, 81, 962, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.013 · DOI
- Norris, 2005, Circumstances of out of hospital cardiac arrest in patients with ischaemic heart disease, Heart, 91, 1537, 10.1136/hrt.2004.057018 · DOI
- Herlitz, 1994, Effect of bystander initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation on ventricular fibrillation and survival after witnessed cardiac arrest outside hospital, Br Hear J, 72, 408, 10.1136/hrt.72.5.408 · DOI
- Ong, 2013, National population based survey on the prevalence of first aid, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator skills in Singapore, Resuscitation, 84, 1633, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.05.008 · DOI
- Lee, 2017, Singapore defibrillation guidelines 2016, Singapore Med J, 58, 354, 10.11622/smedj.2017068 · DOI
- 2016, The PulsePoint Respond mobile device application to crowdsource basic life support for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Challenges for optimal implementation, Resuscitation, 98, 20, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.09.392 · DOI
- Song, 2014, Dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a metropolitan city: a before-after population-based study, Resuscitation, 85, 34, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.06.004 · DOI
- Ho, 2016, Barriers to dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Singapore, Resuscitation, 105, 149, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.05.006 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions
Mentzelopoulos, S. D., Couper, K., Voorde, P. V. D., Druwé, P., Blom, M., Perkins, G. D., Lulic, I., Djakow, J., Raffay, V., Lilja, G., et al. (2021) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.017 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Tay, P. J. M., Pek, P. P., Fan, Q., Ng, Y. Y., Leong, B. S.-H., Gan, H. N., Mao, D. R., Chia, M. Y. C., Cheah, S. O., Doctor, N., Tham, L. P., & Ong, M. E. H.
- Affiliations
- Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
- Singapore General Hospital (SG)
- Tan Tock Seng Hospital (SG)
- National University Hospital (SG)
- Changi General Hospital (SG)
- Khoo Teck Puat Hospital (SG)
- Ng Teng Fong General Hospital (SG)
- Sengkang General Hospital (SG)
- KK Women's and Children's Hospital (SG)
- SingHealth (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Tay, Pamela Jia Min
- ORCID
- Venue
- Resuscitation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 146
- Pages
- 220-228
- ISSN
- 0300-9572 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2989420895
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10
- FWCI
- 8.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Resuscitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Health -Singapore (HSRG/ 0021/2012)
- Ministry of Health
- National Medical Research Council (NMRC/CSA/ 0049/2013, NMRC/CSA/ 024/2010)
- Ministerio de Sanidad, Consumo y Bienestar Social
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
- Keywords
- out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, bystander CPR, dispatcher-assisted CPR, automated external defibrillators, public housing, mobile application, return of spontaneous circulation, survival, community-based intervention, Singapore, OHCA registry, prehospital care, public health policy evaluation, stepped wedge design
- MeSH terms
- Emergency Medical Dispatcher, Emergency Medical Services, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Singapore, Program Evaluation, Survival Analysis, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Community Networks, Defibrillators, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Quality Improvement, Patient Care Bundles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review