Cited by 34Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy StudiesPlant Taxonomy and PhylogeneticsSilicon Effects in Agriculture

Revised taxonomic interpretations of Cyperaceae phytoliths for (paleo)botanical studies with some notes on terminology

Murungi, May L., Bamford, Marion K.·2020·Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2020.104189

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 34

Authors
Murungi, M. L., & Bamford, M. K.
Affiliations
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Corresponding author
Murungi, May L.
Venue
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
275
Pages
104189
ISSN
0034-6667 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004785298
Cited by
34
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Palaeontological Scientific Trust
  • Leakey Foundation
  • National Research Foundation of South Africa
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Silicon Effects in Agriculture
Keywords
Cyperaceae, phytolith morphology, sedge taxonomy, Cyperus, Eleocharis, Fuirena, Scleria, paleobotany, plant silica, homoplasy, generic classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review