Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and sensory modulation disorder: A comparison of behavior and physiology
Abstract
Children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are impulsive, inattentive and hyperactive, while children with sensory modulation disorder (SMD), one subtype of Sensory Processing Disorder, have difficulty responding adaptively to daily sensory experiences. ADHD and SMD are often difficult to distinguish. To differentiate these disorders in children, clinical ADHD, SMD, and dual diagnoses were assessed. All groups had significantly more sensory, attention, activity, impulsivity, and emotional difficulties than typical children, but with distinct profiles. Inattention was greater in ADHD compared to SMD. Dual diagnoses had more sensory-related behaviors than ADHD and more attentional difficulties than SMD. SMD had more sensory issues, somatic complaints, anxiety/depression, and difficulty adapting than ADHD. SMD had greater physiological/electrodermal reactivity to sensory stimuli than ADHD and typical controls. Parent-report measures identifying sensory, attentional, hyperactive, and impulsive difficulties varied in agreement with clinician's diagnoses. Evidence suggests ADHD and SMD are distinct diagnoses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A strong and positive correlation has been observed between difficulties in sensory processing and executive function deficits in various populations, such as premature children, children with autism spectrum disorders, and children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
“A strong and positive correlation has also been observed between difficulties in sensory processing and executive function deficits in various populations, such as premature children (21–23), children with ASDs (24–26), and children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (27–29).”
From Assessment of Sensory Processing and Executive Functions in Childhood: Development, Reliability, and Validity of the EPYFEI (2018) · cites this paper as [27]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 107 · Cited by 125
- Authors
- Miller, L. J., Nielsen, D. M., & Schoen, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Sensory Processing Disorder Foundation (US)
- Corresponding author
- Miller, Lucy Jane
- Venue
- Research in Developmental Disabilities
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 804-818
- ISSN
- 0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010577460
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Keywords
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, sensory modulation disorder, sensory processing disorders, dual diagnosis, differential diagnosis, inattention, impulsivity, hyperactivity, somatic symptoms, anxiety and depression, parent-report measures, children
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Arousal, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Psychophysiology, Reference Values, Sensation Disorders, Comorbidity, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Sensory Gating
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review