Pre-school children with suspected autism spectrum disorders: do girls and boys have the same profiles?
Abstract
The male to female ratio is raised in autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Previous studies have suggested that girls with ASD have more problems with communication than boys, but boys show more repetitive behaviours than girls. In this study, 20 girls, 1.8-3.9 years of age were matched for chronological and developmental age with 20 boys with suspected ASD. All the children were recruited after population screening and referral by Child Health Care Services to a specialised neuropsychiatry clinic, where they underwent comprehensive neuropsychiatric assessments. Comparisons were made with regard to diagnosis, developmental profiles and global disability. No significant gender differences were found. There were strong correlations between results obtained in different developmental areas. The results suggest that either (1) previous studies finding clear gender differences may have overrated discrepancies between girls and boys in ASD, or that (2) there may be girls, who will not be identified in the early years with our current screening instruments. More research with a much larger population representative study samples is required.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The higher estimated prevalence among boys might result from sex-specific differences in ASD risk or differences in identification of girls with ASD arising from less well-recognized symptom profiles, or both.
“The higher estimated prevalence among boys might result from sex-specific differences in ASD risk (27,28) or differences in identification of girls with ASD arising from less well-recognized symptom profiles (29), or both.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 102
- Authors
- Andersson, G. W., Gillberg, C., & Miniscalco, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Andersson, Gunilla Westman
- Venue
- Research in Developmental Disabilities
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 413-422
- ISSN
- 0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078452450
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wilhelm and Martina Lundgrens Foundation
- Swedish Science Council (B41-f 1883/09)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, preschool children, gender differences, autistic girls, developmental profile, global disability, communication difficulties, repetitive behavior, autism screening, neuropsychiatric assessment
- MeSH terms
- Autistic Disorder, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Communication Disorders, Female, Humans, Infant, Language Development Disorders, Male, Mass Screening, Neuropsychological Tests, Sex Characteristics, Social Behavior, Stereotyped Behavior, Stereotypic Movement Disorder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review