Cited by 51Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFamily and Disability Support Research

Factors influencing waiting times for diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder in children and adults

McKenzie, Karen, Forsyth, Kirsty, O’Hare, Anne, McClure, Iain, Rutherford, Marion, Murray, Aja, Irvine, Linda·2015·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

Aims To identify the main factors predicting delays in diagnosis for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) at three stages in the diagnostic process: wait for first appointment; assessment duration, and total wait for diagnosis. Method Data were gathered from 150 case notes (80 child and 70 adult cases) from 16 diagnosing services across Scotland. Results Having more information pre-assessment was associated with a reduced duration of the diagnostic process for children. This relationship was partially mediated by a reduction in the number of contacts required for diagnosis. In adults, having more factors associated with ASD (increased risk) reduced the wait time from referral to first appointment, but increased the overall duration of the diagnostic process. The latter relationship was partially mediated by an increase in the number of contacts required for diagnosis. Conclusion Within children's services, increasing the amount of relevant information available pre-assessment is likely to reduce total duration of the assessment process by reducing number of contacts required. Having a high risk of ASD as an adult appears to result in being seen more quickly following referral, but also to increase the number of contacts needed and assessment duration. As a result, it increases and total duration overall.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.07.033

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adults experienced a mean duration of 159.2 days between referral and receiving a diagnosis.

    “Adults experienced a mean duration of 159.2 days between referral and receiving a diagnosis (McKenzie et al., 2015).”

    From Diagnosis of autism in adulthood: A scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as McKenzie et al., 2015

  • Diagnosis duration was unrelated to client gender or service adherence to NICE guidelines, but client characteristics including intellectual disability and additional support needs predicted longer duration.

    “Diagnosis duration was unrelated to client gender (Rutherford, McKenzie, Johnson, et al., 2016) or service adherence to NICE guidelines (McKenzie et al., 2016), but client characteristics including intellectual disability and additional support needs predicted longer duration (McKenzie et al., 2015).”

    From Diagnosis of autism in adulthood: A scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as McKenzie et al., 2015

  • In adults recently diagnosed with autism in Scotland, total number of contacts predicted shorter wait to first appointment but longer assessment and total duration.

    “In adults, risk score (neurological disorders, ID, language delay/regression, preterm birth, additional support needs, family history, supported care) and total number of contacts predicted shorter wait to first appointment but longer assessment and total duration.”

    From Diagnosis of autism in adulthood: A scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as McKenzie et al. (2015)

  • In adults recently diagnosed with autism in Scotland, risk score predicted shorter wait to first appointment but longer assessment and total duration.

    “In adults, risk score (neurological disorders, ID, language delay/regression, preterm birth, additional support needs, family history, supported care) and total number of contacts predicted shorter wait to first appointment but longer assessment and total duration.”

    From Diagnosis of autism in adulthood: A scoping review (2020) · cites this paper as McKenzie et al. (2015)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKenzie, K., Forsyth, K., O’Hare, A., McClure, I., Rutherford, M., Murray, A., & Irvine, L.
Affiliations
  • Northumbria University (GB)
  • Queen Margaret University (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • NHS Lothian (GB)
Corresponding author
McKenzie, Karen
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
45-46
Pages
300-306
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135153693
Cited by
51
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Scottish Government
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, delayed diagnosis, waiting time, risk factors, children, adults, diagnostic services
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Adult, Appointments and Schedules, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Scotland, Time Factors, Young Adult, Delayed Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review